乌干达以香蕉为基础的农业系统的未来如何?参与式场景分析

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
E. Ronner , G.J. van de Ven , K. Nowakunda , J. Tugumisirize , J. Kayiita , G. Taulya , G. Uckert , K.K.E. Descheemaeker
{"title":"乌干达以香蕉为基础的农业系统的未来如何?参与式场景分析","authors":"E. Ronner ,&nbsp;G.J. van de Ven ,&nbsp;K. Nowakunda ,&nbsp;J. Tugumisirize ,&nbsp;J. Kayiita ,&nbsp;G. Taulya ,&nbsp;G. Uckert ,&nbsp;K.K.E. Descheemaeker","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Population pressure, land scarcity and encroachment of nature reserves are challenging sustainable intensification of agriculture in Uganda. One of the main staple crops in Uganda is East African Highland banana. Area expansion and improved management have enhanced the economic performance of banana, yet at the expense of food security, environmental and social sustainability. While a transition of banana-based farming systems to a more sustainable future seems necessary, the desired future state and pathways of getting there may differ among actors involved.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Our study aimed to co-design potential transition pathways with stakeholders along the banana value chain in Uganda, and to assess the effects of these pathways on sustainability indicators at the household level.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We conducted a participatory scenario analysis consisting of: 1) stakeholders envisioning and backcasting a sustainable future for two banana-based farming systems in Uganda; 2) researchers developing and quantifying plausible future scenarios to assess their effects on locally-relevant sustainability indicators at the household level; 3) stakeholders reflecting on the results, including synergies and trade-offs between sustainability indicators.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Stakeholders' envisioned future combined with main trends influencing banana-based farming systems resulted in four contrasting scenarios: <em>Marginalisation</em> (stagnation compared with the reference baseline); <em>Business as usual</em> (extrapolation of historic trends); <em>Intensification</em> (including Integrated Soil Fertility Management and collective marketing of banana); and <em>Transformation</em> (irrigation in banana, balanced crop nutrient management, cooperatives, and increased farm sizes for some as other households leave agriculture).</p><p>Compared with the current baseline situation, selected sustainability indicators food self-sufficiency and farm gross margins decreased in <em>Marginalisation</em>, but improved in all other scenarios. Soil nutrient balances were unfavourable in all scenarios, except with balanced crop nutrition in <em>Transformation</em>. Stakeholders recognised labour as a main trade-off for desired improvements in other sustainability domains. Stakeholders also reflected on benefits and risks of a continued specialisation in banana, and fiercely debated the desirability of mineral fertilizer use.</p><p>The active involvement of stakeholders in providing the building blocks for the scenarios, identifying relevant indicators and reflecting on the results, aimed to guide stakeholders on concrete entry points for improving sustainability of the system.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNFICANCE</h3><p>Indications of stakeholder commitment towards a more sustainable future included a convergence of ideas on the need for Integrated Soil Fertility Management, collaboration in cooperatives and the need for savings to overcome risks of specialising in banana. Meanwhile, higher-level advocacy and support is required in decision-making on more complex, long-term challenges.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"209 ","pages":"Article 103669"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What future for banana-based farming systems in Uganda? A participatory scenario analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Ronner ,&nbsp;G.J. van de Ven ,&nbsp;K. Nowakunda ,&nbsp;J. Tugumisirize ,&nbsp;J. Kayiita ,&nbsp;G. Taulya ,&nbsp;G. Uckert ,&nbsp;K.K.E. Descheemaeker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>Population pressure, land scarcity and encroachment of nature reserves are challenging sustainable intensification of agriculture in Uganda. One of the main staple crops in Uganda is East African Highland banana. Area expansion and improved management have enhanced the economic performance of banana, yet at the expense of food security, environmental and social sustainability. While a transition of banana-based farming systems to a more sustainable future seems necessary, the desired future state and pathways of getting there may differ among actors involved.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>Our study aimed to co-design potential transition pathways with stakeholders along the banana value chain in Uganda, and to assess the effects of these pathways on sustainability indicators at the household level.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>We conducted a participatory scenario analysis consisting of: 1) stakeholders envisioning and backcasting a sustainable future for two banana-based farming systems in Uganda; 2) researchers developing and quantifying plausible future scenarios to assess their effects on locally-relevant sustainability indicators at the household level; 3) stakeholders reflecting on the results, including synergies and trade-offs between sustainability indicators.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Stakeholders' envisioned future combined with main trends influencing banana-based farming systems resulted in four contrasting scenarios: <em>Marginalisation</em> (stagnation compared with the reference baseline); <em>Business as usual</em> (extrapolation of historic trends); <em>Intensification</em> (including Integrated Soil Fertility Management and collective marketing of banana); and <em>Transformation</em> (irrigation in banana, balanced crop nutrient management, cooperatives, and increased farm sizes for some as other households leave agriculture).</p><p>Compared with the current baseline situation, selected sustainability indicators food self-sufficiency and farm gross margins decreased in <em>Marginalisation</em>, but improved in all other scenarios. Soil nutrient balances were unfavourable in all scenarios, except with balanced crop nutrition in <em>Transformation</em>. Stakeholders recognised labour as a main trade-off for desired improvements in other sustainability domains. Stakeholders also reflected on benefits and risks of a continued specialisation in banana, and fiercely debated the desirability of mineral fertilizer use.</p><p>The active involvement of stakeholders in providing the building blocks for the scenarios, identifying relevant indicators and reflecting on the results, aimed to guide stakeholders on concrete entry points for improving sustainability of the system.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNFICANCE</h3><p>Indications of stakeholder commitment towards a more sustainable future included a convergence of ideas on the need for Integrated Soil Fertility Management, collaboration in cooperatives and the need for savings to overcome risks of specialising in banana. Meanwhile, higher-level advocacy and support is required in decision-making on more complex, long-term challenges.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"209 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23000744\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23000744","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

人口压力、土地稀缺和自然保护区的侵占正在挑战乌干达农业的可持续集约化。乌干达的主要作物之一是东非高地香蕉。面积的扩大和管理的改善提高了香蕉的经济效益,但却以牺牲粮食安全、环境和社会可持续性为代价。虽然以香蕉为基础的农业系统向更可持续的未来过渡似乎是必要的,但所期望的未来状态和实现这一目标的途径可能因参与者而异。目标我们的研究旨在与乌干达香蕉价值链上的利益相关者共同设计潜在的过渡途径,并评估这些途径对家庭层面可持续性指标的影响。方法我们进行了一次参与式情景分析,包括:1)利益攸关方设想和预测乌干达两个香蕉种植系统的可持续未来;2) 研究人员制定并量化合理的未来情景,以评估其对家庭层面当地相关可持续性指标的影响;3) 利益攸关方反思成果,包括可持续性指标之间的协同作用和权衡。结果和结论——参与者设想的未来与影响香蕉种植系统的主要趋势相结合,产生了四种截然不同的情景:边际化(与参考基线相比停滞不前);一切照旧(历史趋势的推断);强化(包括土壤肥力综合管理和香蕉集体营销);和转型(香蕉灌溉、平衡作物营养管理、合作社以及随着其他家庭离开农业而增加一些家庭的农场规模)。与当前的基线情况相比,选定的可持续性指标——粮食自给自足和农场毛利率在边际化中有所下降,但在所有其他情况下都有所改善。土壤养分平衡在所有情况下都是不利的,除了转型期的作物营养平衡。利益相关者认识到,劳动力是其他可持续发展领域所需改进的主要权衡。利益相关者还反思了继续专业化香蕉的好处和风险,并就使用矿物肥料的可取性进行了激烈辩论。利益攸关方积极参与为设想方案提供基础,确定相关指标并反思结果,旨在指导利益攸关方确定提高系统可持续性的具体切入点。利益攸关方致力于实现更可持续的未来的迹象包括,在综合土壤肥力管理的必要性、合作社合作以及为克服香蕉专业化的风险而节省开支的必要性方面,意见一致。与此同时,在应对更复杂的长期挑战的决策中,需要更高级别的宣传和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

What future for banana-based farming systems in Uganda? A participatory scenario analysis

What future for banana-based farming systems in Uganda? A participatory scenario analysis

CONTEXT

Population pressure, land scarcity and encroachment of nature reserves are challenging sustainable intensification of agriculture in Uganda. One of the main staple crops in Uganda is East African Highland banana. Area expansion and improved management have enhanced the economic performance of banana, yet at the expense of food security, environmental and social sustainability. While a transition of banana-based farming systems to a more sustainable future seems necessary, the desired future state and pathways of getting there may differ among actors involved.

OBJECTIVES

Our study aimed to co-design potential transition pathways with stakeholders along the banana value chain in Uganda, and to assess the effects of these pathways on sustainability indicators at the household level.

METHODS

We conducted a participatory scenario analysis consisting of: 1) stakeholders envisioning and backcasting a sustainable future for two banana-based farming systems in Uganda; 2) researchers developing and quantifying plausible future scenarios to assess their effects on locally-relevant sustainability indicators at the household level; 3) stakeholders reflecting on the results, including synergies and trade-offs between sustainability indicators.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Stakeholders' envisioned future combined with main trends influencing banana-based farming systems resulted in four contrasting scenarios: Marginalisation (stagnation compared with the reference baseline); Business as usual (extrapolation of historic trends); Intensification (including Integrated Soil Fertility Management and collective marketing of banana); and Transformation (irrigation in banana, balanced crop nutrient management, cooperatives, and increased farm sizes for some as other households leave agriculture).

Compared with the current baseline situation, selected sustainability indicators food self-sufficiency and farm gross margins decreased in Marginalisation, but improved in all other scenarios. Soil nutrient balances were unfavourable in all scenarios, except with balanced crop nutrition in Transformation. Stakeholders recognised labour as a main trade-off for desired improvements in other sustainability domains. Stakeholders also reflected on benefits and risks of a continued specialisation in banana, and fiercely debated the desirability of mineral fertilizer use.

The active involvement of stakeholders in providing the building blocks for the scenarios, identifying relevant indicators and reflecting on the results, aimed to guide stakeholders on concrete entry points for improving sustainability of the system.

SIGNFICANCE

Indications of stakeholder commitment towards a more sustainable future included a convergence of ideas on the need for Integrated Soil Fertility Management, collaboration in cooperatives and the need for savings to overcome risks of specialising in banana. Meanwhile, higher-level advocacy and support is required in decision-making on more complex, long-term challenges.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信