基于Android的中小微企业商业应用的比较分析(以Buku Kas和Buku Warung应用为例)

A. Septiana, Yeni Priatnasari, Dewi Kartika
{"title":"基于Android的中小微企业商业应用的比较分析(以Buku Kas和Buku Warung应用为例)","authors":"A. Septiana, Yeni Priatnasari, Dewi Kartika","doi":"10.35448/JRAT.V14I2.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research was to compare the Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application based on the criteria for a quality accounting application. The used data collection were observation, questionnaires and literature study. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative and comparative analysis. The results of the analysis of each application show that Buku Kas  and  Buku Warung applications have different completeness. The results of the analysis of the research show that in a comparative assessment by respondents from the questionnaire obtained the results that Buku Kas application get a total score of 2.845 while Buku Warung application get a total score of 2.764. The total score shows that 51% of respondents prefer Buku Kas application as an Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application compared to Buku Warung  application. The conclusion is that there is Buku Kas application has better criteria as an MSME financial bookkeeping application than Buku Warung application.","PeriodicalId":33377,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Comparative Analysis of Business Applications for MSMEs based on Android (Case Study on Buku Kas and Buku Warung Applications)\",\"authors\":\"A. Septiana, Yeni Priatnasari, Dewi Kartika\",\"doi\":\"10.35448/JRAT.V14I2.12279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research was to compare the Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application based on the criteria for a quality accounting application. The used data collection were observation, questionnaires and literature study. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative and comparative analysis. The results of the analysis of each application show that Buku Kas  and  Buku Warung applications have different completeness. The results of the analysis of the research show that in a comparative assessment by respondents from the questionnaire obtained the results that Buku Kas application get a total score of 2.845 while Buku Warung application get a total score of 2.764. The total score shows that 51% of respondents prefer Buku Kas application as an Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application compared to Buku Warung  application. The conclusion is that there is Buku Kas application has better criteria as an MSME financial bookkeeping application than Buku Warung application.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35448/JRAT.V14I2.12279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35448/JRAT.V14I2.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是根据高质量会计应用程序的标准,比较基于Android的中小微企业财务记账应用程序。所使用的数据收集包括观察、问卷调查和文献研究。所使用的数据分析技术是描述性定量分析和比较分析。对每个应用程序的分析结果表明,Buku Kas和Buku Warung应用程序具有不同的完整性。研究分析结果显示,在受访者对问卷的比较评估中,Buku Kas申请的总分为2.845,而Buku Warung申请的总分则为2.764。总分显示,与Buku Warung应用程序相比,51%的受访者更喜欢Buku Kas应用程序作为基于Android的中小微企业财务记账应用程序。结论是,与Buku Warung申请相比,Buku Kas申请作为中小微企业财务记账申请具有更好的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Comparative Analysis of Business Applications for MSMEs based on Android (Case Study on Buku Kas and Buku Warung Applications)
The purpose of this research was to compare the Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application based on the criteria for a quality accounting application. The used data collection were observation, questionnaires and literature study. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative and comparative analysis. The results of the analysis of each application show that Buku Kas  and  Buku Warung applications have different completeness. The results of the analysis of the research show that in a comparative assessment by respondents from the questionnaire obtained the results that Buku Kas application get a total score of 2.845 while Buku Warung application get a total score of 2.764. The total score shows that 51% of respondents prefer Buku Kas application as an Android-based MSME financial bookkeeping application compared to Buku Warung  application. The conclusion is that there is Buku Kas application has better criteria as an MSME financial bookkeeping application than Buku Warung application.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信