地区卫生管理如何提高卫生公平性:范围界定综述

IF 0.9 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Methinee Intarates, T. Dhippayom, N. Upakdee, V. Leesmidt, Jain Weraphong, M. Bangpan
{"title":"地区卫生管理如何提高卫生公平性:范围界定综述","authors":"Methinee Intarates, T. Dhippayom, N. Upakdee, V. Leesmidt, Jain Weraphong, M. Bangpan","doi":"10.56808/2586-940x.1010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : The scoping review of published studies aims to explore what practices and processes can improve equity (horizontal and vertical) in countries that adopted Area Health Management (AHM) utilizing the “ Six Building Blocks Plus ” (SBBP) concept. Method : An electronic search was conducted from the inception to January 27, 2021, from 6 databases (Embase, Social Sciences, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and WHO) and the gray literature. The inclusion criteria were AH, SBBP, and equity. Data extraction was using a standardized data collection form. Results : This scoping review includes 63 full-text studies. SBBP are identical in the horizontal and vertical equity. However, the majority of SBBP were health service delivery, leadership & governance, and health workforce. The result showed the practice and process to improve health equity were related to a health service delivery (HSD). Conclusion : The included study showed horizontal and vertical equity. The equity measurement focused on utilization. AHM utilizing SBBP was mostly showed in HSD, HWF, leadership & governance. This review indicates that HSD could improve equity or cooperate with other SBBP by increasing healthcare accessibility and utilization. The demographic factor that affected equity is ethnicity. Therefore, HSD in area health was crucial in enhancing health promotion equity in different areas, speci fi c diseases, and target patients.","PeriodicalId":15935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How area health management leads to improved equity in health: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Methinee Intarates, T. Dhippayom, N. Upakdee, V. Leesmidt, Jain Weraphong, M. Bangpan\",\"doi\":\"10.56808/2586-940x.1010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : The scoping review of published studies aims to explore what practices and processes can improve equity (horizontal and vertical) in countries that adopted Area Health Management (AHM) utilizing the “ Six Building Blocks Plus ” (SBBP) concept. Method : An electronic search was conducted from the inception to January 27, 2021, from 6 databases (Embase, Social Sciences, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and WHO) and the gray literature. The inclusion criteria were AH, SBBP, and equity. Data extraction was using a standardized data collection form. Results : This scoping review includes 63 full-text studies. SBBP are identical in the horizontal and vertical equity. However, the majority of SBBP were health service delivery, leadership & governance, and health workforce. The result showed the practice and process to improve health equity were related to a health service delivery (HSD). Conclusion : The included study showed horizontal and vertical equity. The equity measurement focused on utilization. AHM utilizing SBBP was mostly showed in HSD, HWF, leadership & governance. This review indicates that HSD could improve equity or cooperate with other SBBP by increasing healthcare accessibility and utilization. The demographic factor that affected equity is ethnicity. Therefore, HSD in area health was crucial in enhancing health promotion equity in different areas, speci fi c diseases, and target patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Health Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56808/2586-940x.1010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对已发表研究的范围审查旨在探讨在采用“六个构建块+”(SBBP)概念的地区健康管理(AHM)的国家,哪些做法和流程可以提高公平性(横向和纵向)。方法:从成立到2021年1月27日,从6个数据库(Embase、Social Sciences、Web of Science、PubMed、CINAHL和世界卫生组织)和灰色文献中进行电子检索。纳入标准为AH、SBBP和衡平法。数据提取使用标准化的数据收集表格。结果:本范围审查包括63项全文研究。SBBP在横向和纵向股权方面是相同的。然而,SBBP的大多数是医疗服务提供、领导和治理以及卫生工作人员。结果表明,提高健康公平的实践和过程与健康服务提供(HSD)有关。结论:纳入的研究显示出横向和纵向的公平性。权益计量侧重于利用率。AHM利用SBBP主要表现在HSD、HWF、领导力和治理方面。这篇综述表明,HSD可以通过提高医疗保健的可及性和利用率来提高公平性或与其他SBBP合作。影响公平的人口因素是种族。因此,区域健康中的HSD对于提高不同地区、特定疾病和目标患者的健康促进公平性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How area health management leads to improved equity in health: a scoping review
Background : The scoping review of published studies aims to explore what practices and processes can improve equity (horizontal and vertical) in countries that adopted Area Health Management (AHM) utilizing the “ Six Building Blocks Plus ” (SBBP) concept. Method : An electronic search was conducted from the inception to January 27, 2021, from 6 databases (Embase, Social Sciences, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, and WHO) and the gray literature. The inclusion criteria were AH, SBBP, and equity. Data extraction was using a standardized data collection form. Results : This scoping review includes 63 full-text studies. SBBP are identical in the horizontal and vertical equity. However, the majority of SBBP were health service delivery, leadership & governance, and health workforce. The result showed the practice and process to improve health equity were related to a health service delivery (HSD). Conclusion : The included study showed horizontal and vertical equity. The equity measurement focused on utilization. AHM utilizing SBBP was mostly showed in HSD, HWF, leadership & governance. This review indicates that HSD could improve equity or cooperate with other SBBP by increasing healthcare accessibility and utilization. The demographic factor that affected equity is ethnicity. Therefore, HSD in area health was crucial in enhancing health promotion equity in different areas, speci fi c diseases, and target patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Research
Journal of Health Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信