Noadiah是“值得信赖的”先知吗?

IF 0.2 2区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Matthew J Korpman
{"title":"Noadiah是“值得信赖的”先知吗?","authors":"Matthew J Korpman","doi":"10.1515/zaw-2023-1003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to popular scholarly consensus, the role of the classical prophets ceased following the rebuilding of Jerusalem during the Second Temple period. This paper will attempt to propose an explanation of 1 Maccabees’ comments about the cessation of prophecy by undertaking a careful and broad examination of the dynamics involved in the Hebrew Bible’s final chronological confrontation between a prophet and religious leader of Israel: Noadiah and Nehemiah. Attention will be given to exploring the basis for Nehemiah’s deliberate dismissal of prophecy and how his choices set a precedent for future leaders of Judah, culminating in the positions taken by the Hasmoneans. In conclusion, it will be argued that Nehemiah’s choice to elevate his own ability for insight above and against those who claimed a profession that typically was seen as granting exclusive access to such things, led to a gradual ostracization of prophets and a diminishing belief in their »trustworthiness«.","PeriodicalId":45627,"journal":{"name":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","volume":"135 1","pages":"52 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Was Noadiah a »Trustworthy« Prophet?\",\"authors\":\"Matthew J Korpman\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/zaw-2023-1003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract According to popular scholarly consensus, the role of the classical prophets ceased following the rebuilding of Jerusalem during the Second Temple period. This paper will attempt to propose an explanation of 1 Maccabees’ comments about the cessation of prophecy by undertaking a careful and broad examination of the dynamics involved in the Hebrew Bible’s final chronological confrontation between a prophet and religious leader of Israel: Noadiah and Nehemiah. Attention will be given to exploring the basis for Nehemiah’s deliberate dismissal of prophecy and how his choices set a precedent for future leaders of Judah, culminating in the positions taken by the Hasmoneans. In conclusion, it will be argued that Nehemiah’s choice to elevate his own ability for insight above and against those who claimed a profession that typically was seen as granting exclusive access to such things, led to a gradual ostracization of prophets and a diminishing belief in their »trustworthiness«.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"volume\":\"135 1\",\"pages\":\"52 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2023-1003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ZEITSCHRIFT FUR DIE ALTTESTAMENTLICHE WISSENSCHAFT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2023-1003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据普遍的学术共识,在第二圣殿时期重建耶路撒冷后,古典先知的作用就停止了。本文试图通过仔细而广泛地研究《希伯来圣经》中先知和以色列宗教领袖诺阿和尼希米之间最后的时间对抗所涉及的动态,来解释马卡比一世关于停止预言的评论。我们将关注探究尼希米故意否定预言的基础,以及他的选择如何为未来的犹大领导人开创先例,最终导致哈斯莫尼亚人采取的立场。总之,有人会说,尼希米选择将自己的洞察力提升到那些声称自己的职业通常被视为只允许接触这些东西的人之上,这导致了对先知的逐渐排斥,并削弱了对他们“可信度”的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Was Noadiah a »Trustworthy« Prophet?
Abstract According to popular scholarly consensus, the role of the classical prophets ceased following the rebuilding of Jerusalem during the Second Temple period. This paper will attempt to propose an explanation of 1 Maccabees’ comments about the cessation of prophecy by undertaking a careful and broad examination of the dynamics involved in the Hebrew Bible’s final chronological confrontation between a prophet and religious leader of Israel: Noadiah and Nehemiah. Attention will be given to exploring the basis for Nehemiah’s deliberate dismissal of prophecy and how his choices set a precedent for future leaders of Judah, culminating in the positions taken by the Hasmoneans. In conclusion, it will be argued that Nehemiah’s choice to elevate his own ability for insight above and against those who claimed a profession that typically was seen as granting exclusive access to such things, led to a gradual ostracization of prophets and a diminishing belief in their »trustworthiness«.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The Zeitschrift für die Alttestamentliche Wissenschaft, which is published in four issues of 160 pages each plus supplements, has been the leading international and interconfessional periodical in the field of research in the Old Testament und Early Judaism for over one hundred years. Open to various ways of posing the questions of scholarship, the journal features high quality contributions in English, German, and French. Through its review of periodicals and books, it provides fast and reliable information concerning new publications in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信