诗歌和祷告的形式、主题和功能变化的区别

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Mika S. Pajunen
{"title":"诗歌和祷告的形式、主题和功能变化的区别","authors":"Mika S. Pajunen","doi":"10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Form criticism has long been an indispensable part of psalm studies, and some of its main results are still widely accepted. Nevertheless, certain formal categories distinguished by some, such as the existence of genres of royal or wisdom psalms, have been firmly denied by others. Moreover, psalm and prayer material from the late Second Temple period has nearly from the beginning of form-critical studies been acknowledged to resist formal classification into firm categories. With only a small portion of the available material falling neatly into recognized categories, the limits of the current form-critical approach are obvious. This paper considers whether a differentiation between formal and thematic elements and their further distinction from issues related to the changing functions of psalmody could pave the way for methodologically more nuanced models that would be able to cope more flexibly and reliably with the diversity of the material and the changing social settings behind them.","PeriodicalId":42456,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","volume":"33 1","pages":"264 - 276"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differentiation of Form, Theme, and Changing Functions in Psalms and Prayers\",\"authors\":\"Mika S. Pajunen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Form criticism has long been an indispensable part of psalm studies, and some of its main results are still widely accepted. Nevertheless, certain formal categories distinguished by some, such as the existence of genres of royal or wisdom psalms, have been firmly denied by others. Moreover, psalm and prayer material from the late Second Temple period has nearly from the beginning of form-critical studies been acknowledged to resist formal classification into firm categories. With only a small portion of the available material falling neatly into recognized categories, the limits of the current form-critical approach are obvious. This paper considers whether a differentiation between formal and thematic elements and their further distinction from issues related to the changing functions of psalmody could pave the way for methodologically more nuanced models that would be able to cope more flexibly and reliably with the diversity of the material and the changing social settings behind them.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42456,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"264 - 276\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of the Old Testament","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09018328.2019.1686288","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

形式批评长期以来一直是诗篇研究中不可或缺的一部分,其一些主要成果至今仍被广泛接受。尽管如此,某些由一些人区分的正式类别,例如皇家或智慧诗篇流派的存在,却被其他人坚决否认。此外,第二圣殿后期的赞美诗和祈祷材料几乎从一开始就被认为是批判性研究,反对将其正式归类为固定类别。由于只有一小部分可用材料被整齐地归入公认的类别,目前形式批判方法的局限性是显而易见的。本文考虑了形式元素和主题元素之间的区别,以及它们与诗歌功能变化相关问题的进一步区别,是否可以为方法上更细致的模型铺平道路,这些模型将能够更灵活、更可靠地应对材料的多样性及其背后不断变化的社会环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differentiation of Form, Theme, and Changing Functions in Psalms and Prayers
ABSTRACT Form criticism has long been an indispensable part of psalm studies, and some of its main results are still widely accepted. Nevertheless, certain formal categories distinguished by some, such as the existence of genres of royal or wisdom psalms, have been firmly denied by others. Moreover, psalm and prayer material from the late Second Temple period has nearly from the beginning of form-critical studies been acknowledged to resist formal classification into firm categories. With only a small portion of the available material falling neatly into recognized categories, the limits of the current form-critical approach are obvious. This paper considers whether a differentiation between formal and thematic elements and their further distinction from issues related to the changing functions of psalmody could pave the way for methodologically more nuanced models that would be able to cope more flexibly and reliably with the diversity of the material and the changing social settings behind them.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信