工作-生活界面综述:系统的文献分析

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Indu Sharma, V. Tiwari
{"title":"工作-生活界面综述:系统的文献分析","authors":"Indu Sharma, V. Tiwari","doi":"10.1108/jabs-01-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study is to review the literature on work–life interface (WLI) studies conducted in India, including how cultural and institutional factors affect the work–life balance perception of Indian employees and how they differ from the west.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to select studies included in this systematic review.\n\n\nFindings\nEmployees in India prioritize their family first because of the collectivist culture as opposed to the west, where work forms the role of root identity. Further, it was found that institutional support in India is lower than in developed western countries, resulting in difficulty for Indian employees to balance their work and life domains. Additionally, methodological advancement and large-scale multilevel research are much needed in India, as research on work–life studies is still in its infancy.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study is limited to qualitative synthesis of PRISMA framework. Adopting more advanced “meta-analysis” techniques to review quantitative studies could result in more comprehensive and informative results.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nSince 2009, there has been an increase in empirical studies conducted on work–life studies in India, but no systematic review has been conducted to understand the various theories and variables used by researchers. In this study, we developed a conceptual model to increase the theoretical knowledge of WLI constructs.\n","PeriodicalId":46138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of work–life interface: a systematic literature analysis\",\"authors\":\"Indu Sharma, V. Tiwari\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jabs-01-2022-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this study is to review the literature on work–life interface (WLI) studies conducted in India, including how cultural and institutional factors affect the work–life balance perception of Indian employees and how they differ from the west.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to select studies included in this systematic review.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nEmployees in India prioritize their family first because of the collectivist culture as opposed to the west, where work forms the role of root identity. Further, it was found that institutional support in India is lower than in developed western countries, resulting in difficulty for Indian employees to balance their work and life domains. Additionally, methodological advancement and large-scale multilevel research are much needed in India, as research on work–life studies is still in its infancy.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study is limited to qualitative synthesis of PRISMA framework. Adopting more advanced “meta-analysis” techniques to review quantitative studies could result in more comprehensive and informative results.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nSince 2009, there has been an increase in empirical studies conducted on work–life studies in India, but no systematic review has been conducted to understand the various theories and variables used by researchers. In this study, we developed a conceptual model to increase the theoretical knowledge of WLI constructs.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":46138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Asia Business Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Asia Business Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-01-2022-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Asia Business Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jabs-01-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是回顾在印度进行的工作-生活界面(WLI)研究的文献,包括文化和制度因素如何影响印度员工的工作-生命平衡感知,以及他们与西方的差异。设计/方法/方法系统综述和荟萃分析(PRISMA)框架的首选报告项目用于选择本系统综述中包含的研究。Findings印度的员工把家庭放在首位,因为集体主义文化与西方相反,在西方,工作构成了根身份的角色。此外,研究发现,印度的制度支持低于西方发达国家,导致印度员工难以平衡工作和生活领域。此外,印度迫切需要方法论的进步和大规模的多层次研究,因为工作与生活研究仍处于初级阶段。研究局限性/含义本研究仅限于PRISMA框架的定性综合。采用更先进的“荟萃分析”技术来审查定量研究可能会产生更全面、信息更丰富的结果。原创性/价值自2009年以来,印度对工作-生活研究的实证研究有所增加,但没有进行系统的审查来了解研究人员使用的各种理论和变量。在这项研究中,我们开发了一个概念模型来增加WLI结构的理论知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of work–life interface: a systematic literature analysis
Purpose The purpose of this study is to review the literature on work–life interface (WLI) studies conducted in India, including how cultural and institutional factors affect the work–life balance perception of Indian employees and how they differ from the west. Design/methodology/approach The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta analyses (PRISMA) framework was used to select studies included in this systematic review. Findings Employees in India prioritize their family first because of the collectivist culture as opposed to the west, where work forms the role of root identity. Further, it was found that institutional support in India is lower than in developed western countries, resulting in difficulty for Indian employees to balance their work and life domains. Additionally, methodological advancement and large-scale multilevel research are much needed in India, as research on work–life studies is still in its infancy. Research limitations/implications This study is limited to qualitative synthesis of PRISMA framework. Adopting more advanced “meta-analysis” techniques to review quantitative studies could result in more comprehensive and informative results. Originality/value Since 2009, there has been an increase in empirical studies conducted on work–life studies in India, but no systematic review has been conducted to understand the various theories and variables used by researchers. In this study, we developed a conceptual model to increase the theoretical knowledge of WLI constructs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信