继续提问

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Current Swedish Archaeology Pub Date : 2021-06-10 DOI:10.37718/CSA.2016.03

C. Fowler

{"title":"继续提问","authors":"C. Fowler","doi":"10.37718/CSA.2016.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.","PeriodicalId":38457,"journal":{"name":"Current Swedish Archaeology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Keep Asking Questions\",\"authors\":\"C. Fowler\",\"doi\":\"10.37718/CSA.2016.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Swedish Archaeology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Swedish Archaeology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2016.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Swedish Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37718/CSA.2016.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

首先，我要祝贺Liv Nilsson Stutz，她的评论令人印象深刻，内容广泛，她将一些重要的观点编织成一个令人信服的论点，为日益跨学科的死亡和埋葬考古学提供了有力的论据。我同意她的大部分观点，并将把它们作为进一步探索的基础。对于明确(次)学科界限，我将发出谨慎的声音，并倾向于提出问题，而不是定义学科领域。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Keep Asking Questions

I would like to start by congratulating Liv Nilsson Stutz on her impressive, wide-ranging review which weaves some important points into a cogent argument for an increasingly transdisciplinary archaeology of death and burial. I agree with most of her arguments and will take them as grounds for further exploration. I will sound a quiet note of caution about crystallizing (sub)disciplinary boundaries and favour asking questions rather than defining disciplinary territories.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Current Swedish Archaeology Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)

CiteScore

1.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量