保留子宫内膜在骨盆重建手术中的利弊

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT Pub Date : 2023-09-07 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23
Chin-Chiu Chen, I-Ting Peng, Ming-Ping Wu
{"title":"保留子宫内膜在骨盆重建手术中的利弊","authors":"Chin-Chiu Chen, I-Ting Peng, Ming-Ping Wu","doi":"10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the \"boat at the dock\" theory, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may happen when the ropes (uterine supportive ligaments) break and/or the water level drops (pelvic floor muscles). Thus, it causes the boat (uterus and other pelvic organs) to slip from normal position and protrude out of the vagina. Surgical intervention with or without hysterectomy (hystero-preservation) is the most effective treatment for POP. Both hysterectomy and hystero-preservation for POP had a high anatomic and clinical cure rate. There is an increasing trend of hystero-preservation for POP during the past decades. The choices of either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation depend on the surgical factors, psychosocial factors, self-esteem and sexuality factors, and surgeon factors. Pelvic reconstructive surgery, either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation, can be performed via different approaches, including abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal routes, with native tissue or with mesh. This review will elucidate their related pros and cons, with further discussion and comparison of hystero-preservation via different routes.</p>","PeriodicalId":45272,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","volume":"12 1","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683956/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Pros and Cons of Hystero-preservation on Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Chiu Chen, I-Ting Peng, Ming-Ping Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>In the \\\"boat at the dock\\\" theory, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may happen when the ropes (uterine supportive ligaments) break and/or the water level drops (pelvic floor muscles). Thus, it causes the boat (uterus and other pelvic organs) to slip from normal position and protrude out of the vagina. Surgical intervention with or without hysterectomy (hystero-preservation) is the most effective treatment for POP. Both hysterectomy and hystero-preservation for POP had a high anatomic and clinical cure rate. There is an increasing trend of hystero-preservation for POP during the past decades. The choices of either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation depend on the surgical factors, psychosocial factors, self-esteem and sexuality factors, and surgeon factors. Pelvic reconstructive surgery, either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation, can be performed via different approaches, including abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal routes, with native tissue or with mesh. This review will elucidate their related pros and cons, with further discussion and comparison of hystero-preservation via different routes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10683956/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy-GMIT","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/gmit.gmit_21_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在“码头上的船”理论中,当绳索(子宫支撑韧带)断裂和/或水位下降(盆底肌肉)时,可能会发生盆腔器官脱垂(POP)。因此,它会导致船(子宫和其他盆腔器官)从正常位置滑落,并从阴道中突出。手术干预加或不加子宫切除术(保留子宫)是POP最有效的治疗方法。子宫切除术和子宫保留术治疗POP具有较高的解剖和临床治愈率。在过去的几十年里,流行音乐保持歇斯底里的趋势越来越明显。子宫切除术或子宫保留术的选择取决于手术因素、心理社会因素、自尊和性因素以及外科医生因素。骨盆重建手术,子宫切除术或子宫保存术,可以通过不同的方法进行,包括腹部、腹腔镜和阴道途径,使用天然组织或网状物。这篇综述将阐明它们的相关利弊,并进一步讨论和比较通过不同途径保存子宫内膜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Pros and Cons of Hystero-preservation on Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery.

In the "boat at the dock" theory, pelvic organ prolapse (POP) may happen when the ropes (uterine supportive ligaments) break and/or the water level drops (pelvic floor muscles). Thus, it causes the boat (uterus and other pelvic organs) to slip from normal position and protrude out of the vagina. Surgical intervention with or without hysterectomy (hystero-preservation) is the most effective treatment for POP. Both hysterectomy and hystero-preservation for POP had a high anatomic and clinical cure rate. There is an increasing trend of hystero-preservation for POP during the past decades. The choices of either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation depend on the surgical factors, psychosocial factors, self-esteem and sexuality factors, and surgeon factors. Pelvic reconstructive surgery, either hysterectomy or hystero-preservation, can be performed via different approaches, including abdominal, laparoscopic, and vaginal routes, with native tissue or with mesh. This review will elucidate their related pros and cons, with further discussion and comparison of hystero-preservation via different routes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信