谁更健康?HEXACO人格领域与健康结果关系的荟萃分析

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
J. Pletzer, Isabel Thielmann, Ingo Zettler
{"title":"谁更健康?HEXACO人格领域与健康结果关系的荟萃分析","authors":"J. Pletzer, Isabel Thielmann, Ingo Zettler","doi":"10.1177/08902070231174574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Researchers and practitioners have long been interested in the relations of basic personality domains with health. Whereas previous meta-analyses have focused on the Big Five traits, we provide the first meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO domains, as assessed by HEXACO Personality Inventories, and various health outcomes ( k = 276, N = 92,319). In general, relations of the HEXACO domains were strongest with mental health, followed by health behavior, whereas relations with physical health outcomes were weak and largely non-significant. All HEXACO domains were significantly linked to mental health and health behavior outcomes. Extraversion exhibited the strongest correlation with mental health ([Formula: see text] = .48), whereas Honesty-Humility ([Formula: see text] = .31), Agreeableness versus Anger ([Formula: see text] = .25), and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .31) were most predictive of health behavior. Physical health was only significantly associated with Emotionality ([Formula: see text] = −.14) and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .10). Honesty-Humility explained incremental variance over the Big Five in several health behavior outcomes, whereas it had little incremental validity for mental and physical health outcomes. Finally, comparing the variance that the HEXACO and the Big Five domains explained in specific health outcomes demonstrated that each personality model occasionally exhibited superior criterion-related validity. Hence, the choice of the more useful personality model could be outcome-dependent.","PeriodicalId":51376,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Personality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who is healthier? A meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO personality domains and health outcomes\",\"authors\":\"J. Pletzer, Isabel Thielmann, Ingo Zettler\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08902070231174574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Researchers and practitioners have long been interested in the relations of basic personality domains with health. Whereas previous meta-analyses have focused on the Big Five traits, we provide the first meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO domains, as assessed by HEXACO Personality Inventories, and various health outcomes ( k = 276, N = 92,319). In general, relations of the HEXACO domains were strongest with mental health, followed by health behavior, whereas relations with physical health outcomes were weak and largely non-significant. All HEXACO domains were significantly linked to mental health and health behavior outcomes. Extraversion exhibited the strongest correlation with mental health ([Formula: see text] = .48), whereas Honesty-Humility ([Formula: see text] = .31), Agreeableness versus Anger ([Formula: see text] = .25), and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .31) were most predictive of health behavior. Physical health was only significantly associated with Emotionality ([Formula: see text] = −.14) and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .10). Honesty-Humility explained incremental variance over the Big Five in several health behavior outcomes, whereas it had little incremental validity for mental and physical health outcomes. Finally, comparing the variance that the HEXACO and the Big Five domains explained in specific health outcomes demonstrated that each personality model occasionally exhibited superior criterion-related validity. Hence, the choice of the more useful personality model could be outcome-dependent.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51376,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Personality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Personality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231174574\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08902070231174574","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

研究人员和实践者长期以来一直对基本人格域与健康的关系感兴趣。鉴于之前的荟萃分析侧重于五大特征,我们首次对HEXACO人格量表评估的HEXACO域与各种健康结果之间的关系进行了荟萃分析(k = 276, N = 92,319)。总的来说,HEXACO结构域与心理健康的关系最强,其次是健康行为,而与身体健康结果的关系较弱,基本上不显著。所有HEXACO结构域都与心理健康和健康行为结果显著相关。外向性与心理健康表现出最强的相关性([公式:见文]= .48),而诚实-谦卑([公式:见文]= .31)、亲和性与愤怒([公式:见文]= .25)和责任心([公式:见文]= .31)最能预测健康行为。身体健康仅与情绪性([公式:见文]= - 0.14)和责任心([公式:见文]= 0.10)显著相关。诚实-谦卑解释了五大因素在几个健康行为结果上的增量方差,而它在心理和身体健康结果上的增量有效性很小。最后,比较HEXACO和大五域在特定健康结果中解释的差异表明,每个人格模型偶尔表现出更高的标准相关效度。因此,对更有用的人格模型的选择可能取决于结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who is healthier? A meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO personality domains and health outcomes
Researchers and practitioners have long been interested in the relations of basic personality domains with health. Whereas previous meta-analyses have focused on the Big Five traits, we provide the first meta-analysis of the relations between the HEXACO domains, as assessed by HEXACO Personality Inventories, and various health outcomes ( k = 276, N = 92,319). In general, relations of the HEXACO domains were strongest with mental health, followed by health behavior, whereas relations with physical health outcomes were weak and largely non-significant. All HEXACO domains were significantly linked to mental health and health behavior outcomes. Extraversion exhibited the strongest correlation with mental health ([Formula: see text] = .48), whereas Honesty-Humility ([Formula: see text] = .31), Agreeableness versus Anger ([Formula: see text] = .25), and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .31) were most predictive of health behavior. Physical health was only significantly associated with Emotionality ([Formula: see text] = −.14) and Conscientiousness ([Formula: see text] = .10). Honesty-Humility explained incremental variance over the Big Five in several health behavior outcomes, whereas it had little incremental validity for mental and physical health outcomes. Finally, comparing the variance that the HEXACO and the Big Five domains explained in specific health outcomes demonstrated that each personality model occasionally exhibited superior criterion-related validity. Hence, the choice of the more useful personality model could be outcome-dependent.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Personality
European Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
8.50%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: It is intended that the journal reflects all areas of current personality psychology. The Journal emphasizes (1) human individuality as manifested in cognitive processes, emotional and motivational functioning, and their physiological and genetic underpinnings, and personal ways of interacting with the environment, (2) individual differences in personality structure and dynamics, (3) studies of intelligence and interindividual differences in cognitive functioning, and (4) development of personality differences as revealed by cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信