贫民窟研究的系统回顾(1996-2017)

S. Hemati, R. Hemati, Hossain moltafet, Asghar Izadi jairan
{"title":"贫民窟研究的系统回顾(1996-2017)","authors":"S. Hemati, R. Hemati, Hossain moltafet, Asghar Izadi jairan","doi":"10.29252/refahj.18.71.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : With the expeditios growth of urban popula tion in developing countries, slums as a social predicament and problem has impeded the urban management of these countries. From this viewpoint, and by doing multiple re searche studies, the researchers of different courses in Iran have tried to survey the grounds of formation and growth of this phenonmenon as well as its consequences and effects. Regarding the nature of the topic, a remarkable variety is observed in the ‘statement of the problem’ and ‘methodol -ogy’. This paper systematically reviewed the field of slums in the past two decades, a critical assessment of how to face field researchers, including the geography and management was carried out as well. The systematic review method in this study provides the opportunity to conduct a descriptive and analytical survey of them with reflections, questions, meth -odology, theoretical framework, and other selected paper characteristics. The findings of this review show that there is no consensus about the term”slums or marginalization” in Iran, and little effort has ben made to offer a public accep tance as regards the definition. It is obvious that in the design of related issues, a quantitative approach has been to be the dominant approach of active researchers in this field. Method : The method used in the current study was a sys tematic review and analysis of the previous studies. Sys tematic reviews provide useful and concise summaries of a given subject on a particular topic, and contrary to the traditional approach to reviewing articles, such as early research, follow strict and rigorous principles. Their ap 1-","PeriodicalId":85537,"journal":{"name":"Social welfare","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic Review of Studies on Slums (1996-2017)\",\"authors\":\"S. Hemati, R. Hemati, Hossain moltafet, Asghar Izadi jairan\",\"doi\":\"10.29252/refahj.18.71.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction : With the expeditios growth of urban popula tion in developing countries, slums as a social predicament and problem has impeded the urban management of these countries. From this viewpoint, and by doing multiple re searche studies, the researchers of different courses in Iran have tried to survey the grounds of formation and growth of this phenonmenon as well as its consequences and effects. Regarding the nature of the topic, a remarkable variety is observed in the ‘statement of the problem’ and ‘methodol -ogy’. This paper systematically reviewed the field of slums in the past two decades, a critical assessment of how to face field researchers, including the geography and management was carried out as well. The systematic review method in this study provides the opportunity to conduct a descriptive and analytical survey of them with reflections, questions, meth -odology, theoretical framework, and other selected paper characteristics. The findings of this review show that there is no consensus about the term”slums or marginalization” in Iran, and little effort has ben made to offer a public accep tance as regards the definition. It is obvious that in the design of related issues, a quantitative approach has been to be the dominant approach of active researchers in this field. Method : The method used in the current study was a sys tematic review and analysis of the previous studies. Sys tematic reviews provide useful and concise summaries of a given subject on a particular topic, and contrary to the traditional approach to reviewing articles, such as early research, follow strict and rigorous principles. Their ap 1-\",\"PeriodicalId\":85537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social welfare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social welfare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29252/refahj.18.71.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social welfare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/refahj.18.71.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

导言:随着发展中国家城市人口的迅猛增长,贫民窟作为一个社会困境和社会问题,一直困扰着发展中国家的城市管理。从这一观点出发,伊朗不同学科的研究人员进行了多项研究,试图探究这一现象形成和发展的原因,以及其后果和影响。关于主题的性质,在“问题陈述”和“方法”中可以观察到显著的变化。本文系统地回顾了近二十年来贫民窟研究领域的发展,并对如何面对贫民窟研究领域的研究人员进行了批判性的评估,包括在地理和管理方面的评估。本研究的系统综述方法提供了对它们进行描述性和分析性调查的机会,包括反思、问题、方法、理论框架和其他选定的论文特征。这次审查的结果表明,在伊朗对“贫民窟或边缘化”一词没有达成共识,也没有作出多少努力使公众接受这一定义。很明显,在相关问题的设计中,定量方法已成为该领域活跃研究者的主导方法。方法:本研究采用的方法是对以往研究的系统回顾和分析。系统评论提供了对特定主题的给定主题的有用和简明的摘要,与传统的审查文章的方法相反,例如早期的研究,遵循严格和严格的原则。他们的ap - 1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic Review of Studies on Slums (1996-2017)
Introduction : With the expeditios growth of urban popula tion in developing countries, slums as a social predicament and problem has impeded the urban management of these countries. From this viewpoint, and by doing multiple re searche studies, the researchers of different courses in Iran have tried to survey the grounds of formation and growth of this phenonmenon as well as its consequences and effects. Regarding the nature of the topic, a remarkable variety is observed in the ‘statement of the problem’ and ‘methodol -ogy’. This paper systematically reviewed the field of slums in the past two decades, a critical assessment of how to face field researchers, including the geography and management was carried out as well. The systematic review method in this study provides the opportunity to conduct a descriptive and analytical survey of them with reflections, questions, meth -odology, theoretical framework, and other selected paper characteristics. The findings of this review show that there is no consensus about the term”slums or marginalization” in Iran, and little effort has ben made to offer a public accep tance as regards the definition. It is obvious that in the design of related issues, a quantitative approach has been to be the dominant approach of active researchers in this field. Method : The method used in the current study was a sys tematic review and analysis of the previous studies. Sys tematic reviews provide useful and concise summaries of a given subject on a particular topic, and contrary to the traditional approach to reviewing articles, such as early research, follow strict and rigorous principles. Their ap 1-
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信