超声辅助提取与常规浸渍对番石榴叶水提物的影响因素及相互作用

Karen Fabiola Fabiola Tena-Rojas, H. Martínez‐Flores, Ma. Guadalupe Garnica-Romo, J. D. Figueroa-Cárdenas, E. Meléndez-Herrera, R. Salgado-Garciglia
{"title":"超声辅助提取与常规浸渍对番石榴叶水提物的影响因素及相互作用","authors":"Karen Fabiola Fabiola Tena-Rojas, H. Martínez‐Flores, Ma. Guadalupe Garnica-Romo, J. D. Figueroa-Cárdenas, E. Meléndez-Herrera, R. Salgado-Garciglia","doi":"10.31989/bchd.v5i10.969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Extraction techniques of phenolic compounds (PC), such as conventional maceration (CM) has been associated with high consumption of organic solvents and time. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and interactions of the variables involved in the aqueous extraction of phenolic compounds from Psidium guajava leaves by CM and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Methods: A split-plot design was developed according to the extraction variables of interest. For CM was time, temperature, and dilution were considered and for UAE the wave amplitude was included.  Response variables were considered the following parameters: yield, total phenolic compounds, total flavonoid compounds, antioxidant capacity measured as radical uptake by ABTS and DPPH.Results: The results show that for UAE, the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL, 50ºC temperature, 30% amplitude, and 20 min of extraction was associated with a higher extraction yield, reporting 125.84 mg of acid gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 381.18 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids and 85.28% ABTS and DPPH 40.2% expressed as radical scavenging activity. On the other hand, the maceration method reported best extraction yield, using the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL of dilution, 50ºC temperature and 10h of extraction time, achieving a total of 62.04 mg of gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 289 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids, and 95.9% ABTS and DPPH 48% regarding radical scavenging activity.Conclusion: The ultrasound process was more effective in extracting phenolic compounds, flavonoid compounds, and their extracts had the highest antioxidant capacity. Keywords: Psidium guajava, phenolic compounds, extraction, ultrasound.","PeriodicalId":93079,"journal":{"name":"Bioactive compounds in health and disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of factors and interactions in ultrasound-assisted extraction and conventional maceration on aqueous extract of Psidium guajava leaves\",\"authors\":\"Karen Fabiola Fabiola Tena-Rojas, H. Martínez‐Flores, Ma. Guadalupe Garnica-Romo, J. D. Figueroa-Cárdenas, E. Meléndez-Herrera, R. Salgado-Garciglia\",\"doi\":\"10.31989/bchd.v5i10.969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Extraction techniques of phenolic compounds (PC), such as conventional maceration (CM) has been associated with high consumption of organic solvents and time. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and interactions of the variables involved in the aqueous extraction of phenolic compounds from Psidium guajava leaves by CM and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Methods: A split-plot design was developed according to the extraction variables of interest. For CM was time, temperature, and dilution were considered and for UAE the wave amplitude was included.  Response variables were considered the following parameters: yield, total phenolic compounds, total flavonoid compounds, antioxidant capacity measured as radical uptake by ABTS and DPPH.Results: The results show that for UAE, the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL, 50ºC temperature, 30% amplitude, and 20 min of extraction was associated with a higher extraction yield, reporting 125.84 mg of acid gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 381.18 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids and 85.28% ABTS and DPPH 40.2% expressed as radical scavenging activity. On the other hand, the maceration method reported best extraction yield, using the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL of dilution, 50ºC temperature and 10h of extraction time, achieving a total of 62.04 mg of gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 289 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids, and 95.9% ABTS and DPPH 48% regarding radical scavenging activity.Conclusion: The ultrasound process was more effective in extracting phenolic compounds, flavonoid compounds, and their extracts had the highest antioxidant capacity. Keywords: Psidium guajava, phenolic compounds, extraction, ultrasound.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioactive compounds in health and disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioactive compounds in health and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31989/bchd.v5i10.969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioactive compounds in health and disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31989/bchd.v5i10.969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:酚类化合物(PC)的提取技术,如传统浸渍法(CM),一直以来都消耗大量的有机溶剂和时间。目的:研究超声辅助提取法和超声辅助提取法提取瓜石榴叶中酚类化合物的影响因素及其相互作用。方法:根据感兴趣的提取变量,采用分图设计。CM考虑了时间、温度和稀释度,UAE考虑了波幅。响应变量考虑以下参数:产量、总酚类化合物、总黄酮类化合物、抗氧化能力(以ABTS和DPPH自由基摄取来衡量)。结果:结果表明,在1 g/ 50 mL、50ºC温度、30%幅度、20 min的条件下,UAE的提取率较高,PC的酸没食子当量为125.84 mg /g,总黄酮的槲皮素当量为381.18 mg /g, ABTS和DPPH的自由基清除活性分别为85.28%和40.2%。另一方面,浸渍法提取率最高,在1 g/ 50 mL稀释、50℃温度和10h提取时间下,PC的没食子当量为62.04 mg /g,总黄酮的槲皮素当量为289 mg /g, ABTS和DPPH的自由基清除活性为95.9%,DPPH为48%。结论:超声法提取黄酮类化合物、酚类化合物效果较好,其提取物抗氧化能力最强。关键词:番石榴;酚类化合物;提取;
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of factors and interactions in ultrasound-assisted extraction and conventional maceration on aqueous extract of Psidium guajava leaves
Background: Extraction techniques of phenolic compounds (PC), such as conventional maceration (CM) has been associated with high consumption of organic solvents and time. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects and interactions of the variables involved in the aqueous extraction of phenolic compounds from Psidium guajava leaves by CM and ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE). Methods: A split-plot design was developed according to the extraction variables of interest. For CM was time, temperature, and dilution were considered and for UAE the wave amplitude was included.  Response variables were considered the following parameters: yield, total phenolic compounds, total flavonoid compounds, antioxidant capacity measured as radical uptake by ABTS and DPPH.Results: The results show that for UAE, the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL, 50ºC temperature, 30% amplitude, and 20 min of extraction was associated with a higher extraction yield, reporting 125.84 mg of acid gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 381.18 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids and 85.28% ABTS and DPPH 40.2% expressed as radical scavenging activity. On the other hand, the maceration method reported best extraction yield, using the treatment of 1 g/ 50 mL of dilution, 50ºC temperature and 10h of extraction time, achieving a total of 62.04 mg of gallic equivalents/ g for PC, 289 mg quercetin equivalents/g for total flavonoids, and 95.9% ABTS and DPPH 48% regarding radical scavenging activity.Conclusion: The ultrasound process was more effective in extracting phenolic compounds, flavonoid compounds, and their extracts had the highest antioxidant capacity. Keywords: Psidium guajava, phenolic compounds, extraction, ultrasound.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信