贪婪的独角兽:Airbnb与欧洲12个城市的资本集中

Q1 Social Sciences
Guido Anselmi , Letizia Chiappini , Federico Prestileo
{"title":"贪婪的独角兽:Airbnb与欧洲12个城市的资本集中","authors":"Guido Anselmi ,&nbsp;Letizia Chiappini ,&nbsp;Federico Prestileo","doi":"10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite discourses on how digital platforms have democratized access to the market there is increasing evidence on their role in boosting concentration, as recommender algorithms and digital reputation tools usually favour a small clique of top users, this may include short term rental platforms. There is also mounting evidence regarding the production of negative externalities connected to the proliferation of Airbnb (and similar services). Our contribution investigates the political economy of concentration in Airbnb leveraging the lens of urban studies while problematizing digital platforms as key contemporary infrastructures.</p><p>Using a dataset of 6,5 million reviews from Inside Airbnb we estimate a) yearly revenue and listing concentration b) the proportion of listings which are more likely to feed negative externalities in the housing sector eg. those listing full houses and those having high availability in twelve European cities. Starting from a simple measure of a phenomenon that has hardly been quantized in recent literature, we dissect the role of STR platforms in urban political economy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39061,"journal":{"name":"City, Culture and Society","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The greedy unicorn: Airbnb and capital concentration in 12 European cities\",\"authors\":\"Guido Anselmi ,&nbsp;Letizia Chiappini ,&nbsp;Federico Prestileo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccs.2021.100412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite discourses on how digital platforms have democratized access to the market there is increasing evidence on their role in boosting concentration, as recommender algorithms and digital reputation tools usually favour a small clique of top users, this may include short term rental platforms. There is also mounting evidence regarding the production of negative externalities connected to the proliferation of Airbnb (and similar services). Our contribution investigates the political economy of concentration in Airbnb leveraging the lens of urban studies while problematizing digital platforms as key contemporary infrastructures.</p><p>Using a dataset of 6,5 million reviews from Inside Airbnb we estimate a) yearly revenue and listing concentration b) the proportion of listings which are more likely to feed negative externalities in the housing sector eg. those listing full houses and those having high availability in twelve European cities. Starting from a simple measure of a phenomenon that has hardly been quantized in recent literature, we dissect the role of STR platforms in urban political economy.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City, Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City, Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916621000424\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City, Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877916621000424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

尽管有关于数字平台如何使市场准入民主化的讨论,但越来越多的证据表明,它们在提高集中度方面发挥了作用,因为推荐算法和数字声誉工具通常有利于一小部分顶级用户,这可能包括短期租赁平台。还有越来越多的证据表明,与Airbnb(以及类似服务)的激增有关的负面外部性的产生。我们的贡献是利用城市研究的视角调查Airbnb集中的政治经济学,同时将数字平台作为关键的当代基础设施提出问题。使用来自Airbnb内部的650万条评论的数据集,我们估计了a)年收入和房源集中程度b)房源更有可能在住房领域产生负面外部性的比例。在12个欧洲城市,房源已满以及房源高的房源。从一个在最近的文献中几乎没有量化的现象的简单测量开始,我们剖析了STR平台在城市政治经济中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The greedy unicorn: Airbnb and capital concentration in 12 European cities

Despite discourses on how digital platforms have democratized access to the market there is increasing evidence on their role in boosting concentration, as recommender algorithms and digital reputation tools usually favour a small clique of top users, this may include short term rental platforms. There is also mounting evidence regarding the production of negative externalities connected to the proliferation of Airbnb (and similar services). Our contribution investigates the political economy of concentration in Airbnb leveraging the lens of urban studies while problematizing digital platforms as key contemporary infrastructures.

Using a dataset of 6,5 million reviews from Inside Airbnb we estimate a) yearly revenue and listing concentration b) the proportion of listings which are more likely to feed negative externalities in the housing sector eg. those listing full houses and those having high availability in twelve European cities. Starting from a simple measure of a phenomenon that has hardly been quantized in recent literature, we dissect the role of STR platforms in urban political economy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
City, Culture and Society
City, Culture and Society Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信