将国家权力与社会基本权利的实现联系起来:立法者是否有自由裁量权的空间?

Q3 Social Sciences
Rosana Helena Maas, M. Moraes
{"title":"将国家权力与社会基本权利的实现联系起来:立法者是否有自由裁量权的空间?","authors":"Rosana Helena Maas, M. Moraes","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002021000100183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The effectiveness and protection of the fundamental social rights are purposes of the State, linking all the State Powers in this task. In face of such a situation, and of the problems and debates that surround the fundamental social rights, notably peered here their multifunctional nature and the possibilities of judicial protection, it is aimed to analyze the feasibility of the recognition of a margin of appreciation from the legislator in relation to these rights. It is asked, thus, if, in front of these features and of the state link to their protection, there is space for a legislative margin of appreciation in the implementation of the fundamental social rights, using, for this purpose, the deductive method and the bibliographic research technic. It is possible to conclude, from the conducted study, that the space for legislative decision is not unlimited, being the legislator, like the other State Powers, linked to the implementation of the fundamental social rights, being him the first to guarantee them, legitimating himself to the judicial action in face of his omission.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La vinculación de los poderes del estado a la concretización de derechos fundamentales sociales: ¿hay espacio para un margen de apreciación del legislador?\",\"authors\":\"Rosana Helena Maas, M. Moraes\",\"doi\":\"10.4067/s0718-52002021000100183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The effectiveness and protection of the fundamental social rights are purposes of the State, linking all the State Powers in this task. In face of such a situation, and of the problems and debates that surround the fundamental social rights, notably peered here their multifunctional nature and the possibilities of judicial protection, it is aimed to analyze the feasibility of the recognition of a margin of appreciation from the legislator in relation to these rights. It is asked, thus, if, in front of these features and of the state link to their protection, there is space for a legislative margin of appreciation in the implementation of the fundamental social rights, using, for this purpose, the deductive method and the bibliographic research technic. It is possible to conclude, from the conducted study, that the space for legislative decision is not unlimited, being the legislator, like the other State Powers, linked to the implementation of the fundamental social rights, being him the first to guarantee them, legitimating himself to the judicial action in face of his omission.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estudios Constitucionales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000100183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002021000100183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

:有效性和保护基本社会权利是国家的宗旨,在这项任务中把所有国家权力联系在一起。面对这种情况,以及围绕基本社会权利的问题和辩论,特别是在这里探讨其多功能性和司法保护的可能性,本报告旨在分析立法者承认与这些权利有关的升值幅度的可行性。因此,有人问,在这些特征以及与保护这些特征的国家联系之前,在实现基本社会权利方面,是否有立法欣赏余地,为此目的,使用演绎方法和书目研究技术。从所进行的研究中可以得出结论,立法决定的空间并不是无限的,作为立法者,与其他国家权力机构一样,与基本社会权利的实施联系在一起,是他第一个保障这些权利的人,在他不作为的情况下,使自己在司法行动中合法化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La vinculación de los poderes del estado a la concretización de derechos fundamentales sociales: ¿hay espacio para un margen de apreciación del legislador?
: The effectiveness and protection of the fundamental social rights are purposes of the State, linking all the State Powers in this task. In face of such a situation, and of the problems and debates that surround the fundamental social rights, notably peered here their multifunctional nature and the possibilities of judicial protection, it is aimed to analyze the feasibility of the recognition of a margin of appreciation from the legislator in relation to these rights. It is asked, thus, if, in front of these features and of the state link to their protection, there is space for a legislative margin of appreciation in the implementation of the fundamental social rights, using, for this purpose, the deductive method and the bibliographic research technic. It is possible to conclude, from the conducted study, that the space for legislative decision is not unlimited, being the legislator, like the other State Powers, linked to the implementation of the fundamental social rights, being him the first to guarantee them, legitimating himself to the judicial action in face of his omission.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Estudios Constitucionales
Estudios Constitucionales Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信