汽车事故中的最终意图和自觉内疚:阿根廷刑法的观点

IF 1.2 Q1 LAW
C. Pérez
{"title":"汽车事故中的最终意图和自觉内疚:阿根廷刑法的观点","authors":"C. Pérez","doi":"10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.","PeriodicalId":40796,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas CUC","volume":"13 1","pages":"213-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El dolo eventual y la culpa consciente en los accidentes automovilísticos: la perspectiva desde el derecho penal argentino\",\"authors\":\"C. Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"213-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于欺诈和有意识犯罪之间区别的法律学说和判例法学说并非毫无争议。在某些情况下,比如交通事故,这种差异很难确定。本文将重点分析这一主题,并试图从当代犯罪理论中给出答案,从而研究目前这一问题是否有解决方案,并考察这些行为是故意还是过失类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El dolo eventual y la culpa consciente en los accidentes automovilísticos: la perspectiva desde el derecho penal argentino
Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
50.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信