包容性领导：规模验证和潜在后果

IF 4.2 3区管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT

Leadership & Organization Development Journal Pub Date : 2021-08-13 DOI:10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0327

Amer Ali Al-Atwi, Kamal Kadhim Al-Hassani

{"title":"包容性领导：规模验证和潜在后果","authors":"Amer Ali Al-Atwi, Kamal Kadhim Al-Hassani","doi":"10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims both to develop and validate a measure for inclusive leadership and to test some its potential consequences by examining the relationship between inclusive leadership and different dimensions of work performance (proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity) through the mediating role of the perceptions of inclusion.Design/methodology/approachWe use data generated from an expert panel (n = 20) and two surveys (n = 235; n = 333) to generate items and establish convergent and discriminant validity. Data were gathered from 363 faculty to examine inclusive leadership's consequences.FindingsThe results empirically support Randel et al.’s conceptualization of inclusive leadership and evidence the psychometric properties of the study's scale. The results also empirically support the proposed relationships between inclusive leadership and various work-performance dimensions.Originality/valueWe develop and validate a more comprehensive measure of inclusive leadership and test some of its potential consequences.","PeriodicalId":48033,"journal":{"name":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive leadership: scale validation and potential consequences\",\"authors\":\"Amer Ali Al-Atwi, Kamal Kadhim Al-Hassani\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis study aims both to develop and validate a measure for inclusive leadership and to test some its potential consequences by examining the relationship between inclusive leadership and different dimensions of work performance (proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity) through the mediating role of the perceptions of inclusion.Design/methodology/approachWe use data generated from an expert panel (n = 20) and two surveys (n = 235; n = 333) to generate items and establish convergent and discriminant validity. Data were gathered from 363 faculty to examine inclusive leadership's consequences.FindingsThe results empirically support Randel et al.’s conceptualization of inclusive leadership and evidence the psychometric properties of the study's scale. The results also empirically support the proposed relationships between inclusive leadership and various work-performance dimensions.Originality/valueWe develop and validate a more comprehensive measure of inclusive leadership and test some of its potential consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leadership & Organization Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0327\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leadership & Organization Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/lodj-08-2020-0327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 8

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过包容性认知的中介作用，研究包容性领导与工作绩效的不同维度（熟练度、适应性和主动性）之间的关系，从而制定和验证包容性领导的衡量标准，并测试其一些潜在后果。设计/方法论/方法我们使用一个专家小组（n=20）和两次调查（n=235；n=333）产生的数据来产生项目，并建立收敛和判别有效性。从363名教师那里收集了数据，以考察包容性领导的后果。研究结果从经验上支持Randel等人包容性领导的概念化，并证明了该研究量表的心理测量特性。研究结果还实证支持了包容性领导与各种工作绩效维度之间的关系。独创性/价值我们制定并验证了一种更全面的包容性领导力衡量标准，并测试了其一些潜在后果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Inclusive leadership: scale validation and potential consequences

PurposeThis study aims both to develop and validate a measure for inclusive leadership and to test some its potential consequences by examining the relationship between inclusive leadership and different dimensions of work performance (proficiency, adaptivity, and proactivity) through the mediating role of the perceptions of inclusion.Design/methodology/approachWe use data generated from an expert panel (n = 20) and two surveys (n = 235; n = 333) to generate items and establish convergent and discriminant validity. Data were gathered from 363 faculty to examine inclusive leadership's consequences.FindingsThe results empirically support Randel et al.’s conceptualization of inclusive leadership and evidence the psychometric properties of the study's scale. The results also empirically support the proposed relationships between inclusive leadership and various work-performance dimensions.Originality/valueWe develop and validate a more comprehensive measure of inclusive leadership and test some of its potential consequences.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Leadership & Organization Development Journal MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

7.70

自引率

6.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： The journal addresses a broad range of topics which are relevant to organizations and reflective of societal developments. Public and private sector organizations alike face ongoing pressure to streamline activities, improve efficiency and achieve demanding organizational objectives. In this context, the ability of senior managers to understand the culture and dynamics of organizations and to deliver strong leadership during periods of change, could be the difference between organizational failure and success.