从社会学裁判的角度分析COVID-19的政策分析

Sapto Hermawan, H. Herman
{"title":"从社会学裁判的角度分析COVID-19的政策分析","authors":"Sapto Hermawan, H. Herman","doi":"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.","PeriodicalId":31258,"journal":{"name":"Arena Hukum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENANGANAN COVID-19 DARI PERSPEKTIF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE\",\"authors\":\"Sapto Hermawan, H. Herman\",\"doi\":\"10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arena Hukum\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arena Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arena Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

作为一个受新冠肺炎疫情影响的国家,印度尼西亚通过大规模社会限制(PSBB)采取了政策选择,并得到了从《政府法规》、《政府条例》到《总统令》的六份法律文件的支持。这项社会法律研究旨在通过罗斯科·庞德的社会学法学来分析新冠肺炎应对政策。基于2020年3月至12月的实证数据,结果表明,通过分析与新冠肺炎部署限制的目的非常矛盾的规范层次、目的的明确性和有用性,克服新冠肺炎的政策得到了六份法律文件的支持。根据社会学判例,新冠肺炎政策应基于四个基本要素,根据公共要求进行调整,以便政策的实施能够有效执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN PENANGANAN COVID-19 DARI PERSPEKTIF SOCIOLOGICAL JURISPRUDENCE
As an affected COVID-19 pandemic country, Indonesia took policy options through Social Restrictions on Large-Scale (PSBB), supported by six legal documents from Government Regulation in Lieu-of-The Law, Government Regulations, to Presidential Decrees. This socio-legal research aims to analyze the COVID-19 countermeasure policy through Roscoe Pound's sociological jurisprudence. Base on empirical data from March to December 2020, the results showed that the policy to overcome COVID-19 is supported by six legal documents when examined through analysis of the hierarchy of norms, clarity of the purpose and usefulness very contradictory to the purpose of the deployment restrictions of COVID-19 itself. Referring to sociological jurisprudence, the COVID-19 policies should be based on four essential elements adjusted to public requirements so that the implementation of the policies can perform effectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信