通过对误解的探索实现元设计:关注对象在实际生产过程中的作用的设计过程验证

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Mizuuchi Tomohide, Okada Eizo, Mizuno Daijiro
{"title":"通过对误解的探索实现元设计:关注对象在实际生产过程中的作用的设计过程验证","authors":"Mizuuchi Tomohide, Okada Eizo, Mizuno Daijiro","doi":"10.1386/jwcp_00029_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case study analyses the role that writing and verbal communication plays when using objects in the collaborative metadesign process. It is common for co-design practices to be introduced in the ideation and other early stages of the design process. In these processes achieving consensus among participants may be critically important. Our research shows that an appropriate physical object can help not only in the initial phase of the process but also in the later stages of designing and production. In this article, we focused on the co-design process carried out by a Japanese craftsman and a group of designers and explored how the artefacts created along the way affected the process of communication. By examining misunderstandings and consensus between the participants, we learnt more about the possible role of objects in bridging the different viewpoints. The results of this study will contribute to the active introduction of metadesign methods in later design phases and, thus, improve the inclusiveness within metadesign projects.","PeriodicalId":38498,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enabling metadesign through an exploration of misinterpretation: Design process verification focusing on the role of objects in the actual production process\",\"authors\":\"Mizuuchi Tomohide, Okada Eizo, Mizuno Daijiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jwcp_00029_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case study analyses the role that writing and verbal communication plays when using objects in the collaborative metadesign process. It is common for co-design practices to be introduced in the ideation and other early stages of the design process. In these processes achieving consensus among participants may be critically important. Our research shows that an appropriate physical object can help not only in the initial phase of the process but also in the later stages of designing and production. In this article, we focused on the co-design process carried out by a Japanese craftsman and a group of designers and explored how the artefacts created along the way affected the process of communication. By examining misunderstandings and consensus between the participants, we learnt more about the possible role of objects in bridging the different viewpoints. The results of this study will contribute to the active introduction of metadesign methods in later design phases and, thus, improve the inclusiveness within metadesign projects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00029_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Writing in Creative Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jwcp_00029_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本案例分析了在协同元设计过程中使用对象时,书面和口头沟通所起的作用。在构思和设计过程的其他早期阶段引入协同设计实践是很常见的。在这些进程中,在参与者之间达成共识可能是至关重要的。我们的研究表明,一个合适的物理对象不仅可以在过程的初始阶段,而且可以在设计和生产的后期阶段提供帮助。在这篇文章中,我们关注了一个日本工匠和一群设计师进行的共同设计过程,并探讨了在此过程中创造的人工制品如何影响交流过程。通过检查参与者之间的误解和共识,我们更多地了解了物体在弥合不同观点方面可能发挥的作用。本研究的结果将有助于在后期设计阶段积极引入元设计方法,从而提高元设计项目的包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enabling metadesign through an exploration of misinterpretation: Design process verification focusing on the role of objects in the actual production process
This case study analyses the role that writing and verbal communication plays when using objects in the collaborative metadesign process. It is common for co-design practices to be introduced in the ideation and other early stages of the design process. In these processes achieving consensus among participants may be critically important. Our research shows that an appropriate physical object can help not only in the initial phase of the process but also in the later stages of designing and production. In this article, we focused on the co-design process carried out by a Japanese craftsman and a group of designers and explored how the artefacts created along the way affected the process of communication. By examining misunderstandings and consensus between the participants, we learnt more about the possible role of objects in bridging the different viewpoints. The results of this study will contribute to the active introduction of metadesign methods in later design phases and, thus, improve the inclusiveness within metadesign projects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice
Journal of Writing in Creative Practice Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信