基于多重排名方法的印度研究型高等教育机构排名:相关性分析

IF 0.6 Q3 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology Pub Date : 2021-02-11 DOI:10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16683

Priyanka Singh, J. Joorel, Hiteshkumar Solanki, Abhishek Kumar, Kruti Trivedi

{"title":"基于多重排名方法的印度研究型高等教育机构排名:相关性分析","authors":"Priyanka Singh, J. Joorel, Hiteshkumar Solanki, Abhishek Kumar, Kruti Trivedi","doi":"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article ranks the same set of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in India using four different ranking methodologies, namely, i) NIRF (Overall): used for Overall category of India Rankings; ii) NIRF (Only Research and Professional Practices parameters); iii) Research Ranking Methodology; a new methodology evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions under NIRF; and vi) IFQ2A index developed by Spanish group of scientists. The four sets of ranked institutions were obtained using methodologies mentioned above and correlation analysis was carried out on these four sets using Pearson Bivariate Correlation. It was found that a very strong and positive correlation exists between ranking of HEIs using new methodology (R2M) evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions and ranking by HEIs using IFQ2A Index.","PeriodicalId":44921,"journal":{"name":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","volume":"41 1","pages":"49-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking of Indian Research Intensive Higher Education Institutions using Multiple Ranking Methodologies a Correlation Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Priyanka Singh, J. Joorel, Hiteshkumar Solanki, Abhishek Kumar, Kruti Trivedi\",\"doi\":\"10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article ranks the same set of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in India using four different ranking methodologies, namely, i) NIRF (Overall): used for Overall category of India Rankings; ii) NIRF (Only Research and Professional Practices parameters); iii) Research Ranking Methodology; a new methodology evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions under NIRF; and vi) IFQ2A index developed by Spanish group of scientists. The four sets of ranked institutions were obtained using methodologies mentioned above and correlation analysis was carried out on these four sets using Pearson Bivariate Correlation. It was found that a very strong and positive correlation exists between ranking of HEIs using new methodology (R2M) evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions and ranking by HEIs using IFQ2A Index.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"49-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16683\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/DJLIT.41.1.16683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文使用四种不同的排名方法对印度同一组高等教育机构进行排名，即：i）NIRF（总体）：用于印度排名的总体类别；ii）NIRF（仅研究和专业实践参数）；iii）研究排名方法；根据NIRF对研究密集型机构进行排名的新方法；以及vi）西班牙科学家小组开发的IFQ2A指数。使用上述方法获得了四组排名机构，并使用Pearson双变量相关对这四组机构进行了相关性分析。研究发现，使用研究密集型机构排名的新方法（R2M）对高等院校进行排名与使用IFQ2A指数对高等院校的排名之间存在非常强的正相关。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Ranking of Indian Research Intensive Higher Education Institutions using Multiple Ranking Methodologies a Correlation Analysis

This article ranks the same set of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in India using four different ranking methodologies, namely, i) NIRF (Overall): used for Overall category of India Rankings; ii) NIRF (Only Research and Professional Practices parameters); iii) Research Ranking Methodology; a new methodology evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions under NIRF; and vi) IFQ2A index developed by Spanish group of scientists. The four sets of ranked institutions were obtained using methodologies mentioned above and correlation analysis was carried out on these four sets using Pearson Bivariate Correlation. It was found that a very strong and positive correlation exists between ranking of HEIs using new methodology (R2M) evolved for ranking of research-intensive institutions and ranking by HEIs using IFQ2A Index.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

11.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology publishes original research and review papers related to library science and IT applied to library activities, services, and products. Major subject fields covered include: Information systems, Knowledge management, Collection building & management, Information behaviour & retrieval, Librarianship/library management, Library & information services, Records management & preservation, etc.