右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼输注在接受门诊白内障手术的老年患者中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法研究

IF 3 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
C. Kaya, N. Çelebi, S. Debbağ, O. Canbay, O. Onal
{"title":"右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼输注在接受门诊白内障手术的老年患者中的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、盲法研究","authors":"C. Kaya, N. Çelebi, S. Debbağ, O. Canbay, O. Onal","doi":"10.4103/2045-9912.337996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dexmedetomidine is an α2 agonist and remifentanil is a short-acting μ opioid agonist. We aimed to compare the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions used for conscious sedation in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery in terms of sedation quality, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction. Eighty patients were allocated into two groups as per the administration of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group) and remifentanil (remifentanil group) infusion in this randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. In dexmedetomidine group (n = 40), after a loading of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, 0.4 μg/kg/h infusion was administered. In the remifentanil group (n = 40), remifentanil at a dose of 0.05 μg/kg was administered for 10 minutes, and then 0.05 μg/kg/min infusion was continued. Observer Assessment Warning/Sedation Scale values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the remifentanil group, although it was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bispectral Index values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group according to the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The dexmedetomidine group had lower Verbal Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale scores evaluating pain intensity compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The nausea Visual Analogue Scale values evaluating the severity of postoperative nausea in the dexmedetomidine group were lower than those in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The surgeon satisfaction was found to be greater in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the remifentanil group (P = 0.015). In geriatric patients, the targeted sedation and analgesia levels were achieved more easily with dexmedetomidine infusion, without hemodynamic and respiratory side effects, compared to remifentanil infusion.","PeriodicalId":18559,"journal":{"name":"Medical Gas Research","volume":"12 1","pages":"146 - 152"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, and blinded study\",\"authors\":\"C. Kaya, N. Çelebi, S. Debbağ, O. Canbay, O. Onal\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/2045-9912.337996\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dexmedetomidine is an α2 agonist and remifentanil is a short-acting μ opioid agonist. We aimed to compare the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions used for conscious sedation in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery in terms of sedation quality, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction. Eighty patients were allocated into two groups as per the administration of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group) and remifentanil (remifentanil group) infusion in this randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. In dexmedetomidine group (n = 40), after a loading of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, 0.4 μg/kg/h infusion was administered. In the remifentanil group (n = 40), remifentanil at a dose of 0.05 μg/kg was administered for 10 minutes, and then 0.05 μg/kg/min infusion was continued. Observer Assessment Warning/Sedation Scale values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the remifentanil group, although it was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bispectral Index values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group according to the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The dexmedetomidine group had lower Verbal Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale scores evaluating pain intensity compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The nausea Visual Analogue Scale values evaluating the severity of postoperative nausea in the dexmedetomidine group were lower than those in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The surgeon satisfaction was found to be greater in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the remifentanil group (P = 0.015). In geriatric patients, the targeted sedation and analgesia levels were achieved more easily with dexmedetomidine infusion, without hemodynamic and respiratory side effects, compared to remifentanil infusion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Gas Research\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"146 - 152\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Gas Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337996\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Gas Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2045-9912.337996","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

右美托咪定是α2受体激动剂,瑞芬太尼是短效μ阿片受体激动剂。我们的目的是比较右美托咪定和瑞芬太尼输注在门诊白内障手术中用于清醒镇静的老年患者的镇静质量、副作用和外科医生满意度。在这项随机、前瞻性、双盲研究中,80例患者根据右美托咪定(右美托咪定组)和瑞芬太尼(瑞芬太尼组)输注被分为两组。右美托咪定组(n = 40),右美托咪定负荷1 μg/kg 10 min后,再输注0.4 μg/kg/h。瑞芬太尼组(n = 40)给予0.05 μg/kg剂量的瑞芬太尼给药10分钟,然后继续0.05 μg/kg/min输注。观察评估:右美托咪定组的镇静质量评分低于瑞芬太尼组,但差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。右美托咪定组评价镇静质量的双谱指数低于瑞芬太尼组(P < 0.05)。右美托咪定组疼痛强度的言语评定量表和视觉模拟量表评分低于瑞芬太尼组(P < 0.05)。右美托咪定组术后恶心视觉模拟评分低于瑞芬太尼组(P < 0.05)。右美托咪定组手术满意度高于瑞芬太尼组(P = 0.015)。在老年患者中,与瑞芬太尼输注相比,右美托咪定输注更容易达到目标镇静和镇痛水平,没有血液动力学和呼吸副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusion in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery: a prospective, randomized, and blinded study
Dexmedetomidine is an α2 agonist and remifentanil is a short-acting μ opioid agonist. We aimed to compare the dexmedetomidine and remifentanil infusions used for conscious sedation in geriatric patients undergoing outpatient cataract surgery in terms of sedation quality, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction. Eighty patients were allocated into two groups as per the administration of dexmedetomidine (dexmedetomidine group) and remifentanil (remifentanil group) infusion in this randomized, prospective, double-blinded study. In dexmedetomidine group (n = 40), after a loading of 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine in 10 minutes, 0.4 μg/kg/h infusion was administered. In the remifentanil group (n = 40), remifentanil at a dose of 0.05 μg/kg was administered for 10 minutes, and then 0.05 μg/kg/min infusion was continued. Observer Assessment Warning/Sedation Scale values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group than in the remifentanil group, although it was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Bispectral Index values evaluating sedation quality were lower in the dexmedetomidine group according to the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The dexmedetomidine group had lower Verbal Rating Scale and Visual Analogue Scale scores evaluating pain intensity compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The nausea Visual Analogue Scale values evaluating the severity of postoperative nausea in the dexmedetomidine group were lower than those in the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). The surgeon satisfaction was found to be greater in the dexmedetomidine group compared with the remifentanil group (P = 0.015). In geriatric patients, the targeted sedation and analgesia levels were achieved more easily with dexmedetomidine infusion, without hemodynamic and respiratory side effects, compared to remifentanil infusion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Gas Research
Medical Gas Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
13.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Medical Gas Research is an open access journal which publishes basic, translational, and clinical research focusing on the neurobiology as well as multidisciplinary aspects of medical gas research and their applications to related disorders. The journal covers all areas of medical gas research, but also has several special sections. Authors can submit directly to these sections, whose peer-review process is overseen by our distinguished Section Editors: Inert gases - Edited by Xuejun Sun and Mark Coburn, Gasotransmitters - Edited by Atsunori Nakao and John Calvert, Oxygen and diving medicine - Edited by Daniel Rossignol and Ke Jian Liu, Anesthetic gases - Edited by Richard Applegate and Zhongcong Xie, Medical gas in other fields of biology - Edited by John Zhang. Medical gas is a large family including oxygen, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, nitrogen, xenon, hydrogen sulfide, nitrous oxide, carbon disulfide, argon, helium and other noble gases. These medical gases are used in multiple fields of clinical practice and basic science research including anesthesiology, hyperbaric oxygen medicine, diving medicine, internal medicine, emergency medicine, surgery, and many basic sciences disciplines such as physiology, pharmacology, biochemistry, microbiology and neurosciences. Due to the unique nature of medical gas practice, Medical Gas Research will serve as an information platform for educational and technological advances in the field of medical gas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信