让管理者更接近论文:衡量商业和管理研究的相关性

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Journal of Education for Business Pub Date : 2023-01-02 DOI:10.1080/08832323.2021.2017251

Carlos Vílchez-Román, Arístides A. Vara-Horna, Lizardo Vargas-Bianchi

{"title":"让管理者更接近论文:衡量商业和管理研究的相关性","authors":"Carlos Vílchez-Román, Arístides A. Vara-Horna, Lizardo Vargas-Bianchi","doi":"10.1080/08832323.2021.2017251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This study aims to validate a data collection tool’s psychometric properties to explore whether business management research’s relevance is a high-order construct made up of its perceived interest and perceived relevance. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to validate a two-factor scale. The sample was composed of 148 MBA students from a Peruvian business school. Results showed the appropriate levels of validity and reliability and confirmed the usefulness of this data set for exploring the relationship between perceived interest and relevance. Businesses and schools can replicate the validated tool for reviewing their curricula and teaching practices, exploring the gap between business and management research results and advancing managers’ research literacy and evidence-based practice in business education and training.","PeriodicalId":47318,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education for Business","volume":"98 1","pages":"17 - 24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bringing managers closer to papers: Measuring the relevance of business and management research\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Vílchez-Román, Arístides A. Vara-Horna, Lizardo Vargas-Bianchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08832323.2021.2017251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This study aims to validate a data collection tool’s psychometric properties to explore whether business management research’s relevance is a high-order construct made up of its perceived interest and perceived relevance. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to validate a two-factor scale. The sample was composed of 148 MBA students from a Peruvian business school. Results showed the appropriate levels of validity and reliability and confirmed the usefulness of this data set for exploring the relationship between perceived interest and relevance. Businesses and schools can replicate the validated tool for reviewing their curricula and teaching practices, exploring the gap between business and management research results and advancing managers’ research literacy and evidence-based practice in business education and training.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"volume\":\"98 1\",\"pages\":\"17 - 24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education for Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.2017251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education for Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.2017251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在验证一种数据收集工具的心理测量属性，以探讨企业管理研究的相关性是否是由其感知兴趣和感知相关性组成的高阶结构。作者进行了验证性因子分析，以验证双因子量表。样本由来自秘鲁一所商学院的148名MBA学生组成。结果显示了适当的效度和信度水平，并证实了该数据集对探索感知兴趣和相关性之间关系的有用性。企业和学校可以复制这一经过验证的工具，用于审查其课程和教学实践，探索商业和管理研究成果之间的差距，并在商业教育和培训中提高管理者的研究素养和基于证据的实践。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Bringing managers closer to papers: Measuring the relevance of business and management research

Abstract This study aims to validate a data collection tool’s psychometric properties to explore whether business management research’s relevance is a high-order construct made up of its perceived interest and perceived relevance. The authors conducted a confirmatory factor analysis to validate a two-factor scale. The sample was composed of 148 MBA students from a Peruvian business school. Results showed the appropriate levels of validity and reliability and confirmed the usefulness of this data set for exploring the relationship between perceived interest and relevance. Businesses and schools can replicate the validated tool for reviewing their curricula and teaching practices, exploring the gap between business and management research results and advancing managers’ research literacy and evidence-based practice in business education and training.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Education for Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Education for Business is for those educating tomorrow''s businesspeople. The journal primarily features basic and applied research-based articles in entrepreneurship, accounting, communications, economics, finance, information systems, management, marketing, and other business disciplines. Along with the focus on reporting research within traditional business subjects, an additional expanded area of interest is publishing articles within the discipline of entrepreneurship. Articles report successful innovations in teaching and curriculum development at the college and postgraduate levels. Authors address changes in today''s business world and in the business professions that are fundamentally influencing the competencies that business graduates need. JEB also offers a forum for new theories and for analyses of controversial issues. Articles in the Journal fall into the following categories: Original and Applied Research; Editorial/Professional Perspectives; and Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices. Articles are selected on a blind peer-reviewed basis. Original and Applied Research - Articles published feature the results of formal research where findings have universal impact. Editorial/Professional Perspective - Articles published feature the viewpoint of primarily the author regarding important issues affecting education for business. Innovative Instructional Classroom Projects/Best Practices - Articles published feature the results of instructional experiments basically derived from a classroom project conducted at one institution by one or several faculty.