有关消融模式的更多信息ḫi共轭

Q1 Arts and Humanities

Indo-European Linguistics Pub Date : 2022-10-31 DOI:10.1163/22125892-bja10019

H. C. Melchert

{"title":"有关消融模式的更多信息ḫi共轭","authors":"H. C. Melchert","doi":"10.1163/22125892-bja10019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Evidence from Palaic shows that contrary to some claims Hittite nasal presents such as šunna- and tarna- do not reflect original PIE\n ḫi- inflection. This paper presents a new account of how they come to inflect as ḫi- verbs in attested Hittite. It also shows that the so-called class of “ḫi- verbs in -i-” reflects in part presents with a suffix *-ói/-i- (Kloekhorst 2006 & 2008), but in part modified acrostatic presents with *o/zero root ablaut. The lexicalized participle LÚ\n pitteant- ‘fugitive’ preserves a trace of the original acrostatic paradigm with *o/e root ablaut. Reasons are also given for why this class appears in Nuclear Indo-European as *ye/o- presents with either *e- or zero-grade of the root.","PeriodicalId":36822,"journal":{"name":"Indo-European Linguistics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More on ablaut patterns in the ḫi-conjugation\",\"authors\":\"H. C. Melchert\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22125892-bja10019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Evidence from Palaic shows that contrary to some claims Hittite nasal presents such as šunna- and tarna- do not reflect original PIE\\n ḫi- inflection. This paper presents a new account of how they come to inflect as ḫi- verbs in attested Hittite. It also shows that the so-called class of “ḫi- verbs in -i-” reflects in part presents with a suffix *-ói/-i- (Kloekhorst 2006 & 2008), but in part modified acrostatic presents with *o/zero root ablaut. The lexicalized participle LÚ\\n pitteant- ‘fugitive’ preserves a trace of the original acrostatic paradigm with *o/e root ablaut. Reasons are also given for why this class appears in Nuclear Indo-European as *ye/o- presents with either *e- or zero-grade of the root.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indo-European Linguistics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indo-European Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indo-European Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22125892-bja10019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

来自Palaic的证据表明，与一些说法相反，赫梯人的鼻音，如šunna和tarna，并没有反映原始PIE ḫi的变化。本文提出了一个新的帐户，他们如何来屈折为ḫi-动词在证实赫梯语。它还表明，所谓的“ḫi-动词在-i-”类反映部分以后缀*-ói/-i-呈现(Kloekhorst 2006 & 2008)，但部分修改的acrostatic以* 0 /零根ablaut呈现。词汇化的分词LÚ pitteant- ' fugitive '保留了原始杂技范式的痕迹，*o/e词根ablaut。还给出了为什么这个类在核印欧语中以*ye/o的形式出现的原因-表示词根的*e-或零级。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

More on ablaut patterns in the ḫi-conjugation

Evidence from Palaic shows that contrary to some claims Hittite nasal presents such as šunna- and tarna- do not reflect original PIE ḫi- inflection. This paper presents a new account of how they come to inflect as ḫi- verbs in attested Hittite. It also shows that the so-called class of “ḫi- verbs in -i-” reflects in part presents with a suffix *-ói/-i- (Kloekhorst 2006 & 2008), but in part modified acrostatic presents with *o/zero root ablaut. The lexicalized participle LÚ pitteant- ‘fugitive’ preserves a trace of the original acrostatic paradigm with *o/e root ablaut. Reasons are also given for why this class appears in Nuclear Indo-European as *ye/o- presents with either *e- or zero-grade of the root.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Indo-European Linguistics Arts and Humanities-History

CiteScore

1.10

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

20 weeks