智利跨期刑法和宪法法院

A. B. Rodríguez
{"title":"智利跨期刑法和宪法法院","authors":"A. B. Rodríguez","doi":"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46480","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines a judgment of the Chilean Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional status of the lex mitior-principle (retrospective application of the milder criminal law). The problem examined is the determination of the margin of legislative discretion left by the constitutional entrenchment of the principle.","PeriodicalId":31642,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","volume":"1 1","pages":"167-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El derecho intertemporal penal chileno y el Tribunal Constitucional\",\"authors\":\"A. B. Rodríguez\",\"doi\":\"10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46480\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines a judgment of the Chilean Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional status of the lex mitior-principle (retrospective application of the milder criminal law). The problem examined is the determination of the margin of legislative discretion left by the constitutional entrenchment of the principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"167-196\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46480\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios de la Justicia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5354/REJ.V0I26.46480","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章审查了智利宪法法院关于缓罪法原则(较轻刑法的追溯适用)的宪法地位的判决。所审查的问题是确定立法自由裁量权的范围,这是宪法对这一原则的保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
El derecho intertemporal penal chileno y el Tribunal Constitucional
The article examines a judgment of the Chilean Constitutional Court regarding the constitutional status of the lex mitior-principle (retrospective application of the milder criminal law). The problem examined is the determination of the margin of legislative discretion left by the constitutional entrenchment of the principle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信