联合国人权委员会权力的演变与设计:反种族隔离运动的复杂遗产

Q4 Arts and Humanities
F. Cowell
{"title":"联合国人权委员会权力的演变与设计:反种族隔离运动的复杂遗产","authors":"F. Cowell","doi":"10.14712/23363231.2019.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of mechanisms to target specific countries for human rights abuses was part of the campaign against apartheid at the UN in the 1960s. This campaign led to reform of the UN Commission on Human Rights, which turned it from a purely “promotional” or precatory body into one with an active mandate to protect individuals from human rights abuses perpetrated by their own state. The institutional politics of human rights at the Commission was plagued by claims of “double standards” and inter-bloc defensiveness. This article argues that the reform of the Commission in the 1960s and the way that its mechanisms were used in the 1970s defined the Commission’s politics in a way that led to its eventual demise in the early 2000s. Keywords:  apartheid; decolonization; human rights; Third World; UN General Assembly; UN Commission on Human Rights DOI:  10.14712/23363231.2019.17 © 2019 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License , which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.","PeriodicalId":33551,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution and Design of Powers at the UN Commission on Human Rights: The Complex Legacy of Anti-Apartheid Activism\",\"authors\":\"F. Cowell\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23363231.2019.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The development of mechanisms to target specific countries for human rights abuses was part of the campaign against apartheid at the UN in the 1960s. This campaign led to reform of the UN Commission on Human Rights, which turned it from a purely “promotional” or precatory body into one with an active mandate to protect individuals from human rights abuses perpetrated by their own state. The institutional politics of human rights at the Commission was plagued by claims of “double standards” and inter-bloc defensiveness. This article argues that the reform of the Commission in the 1960s and the way that its mechanisms were used in the 1970s defined the Commission’s politics in a way that led to its eventual demise in the early 2000s. Keywords:  apartheid; decolonization; human rights; Third World; UN General Assembly; UN Commission on Human Rights DOI:  10.14712/23363231.2019.17 © 2019 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License , which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2019.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Studia Territorialia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23363231.2019.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制定针对特定国家侵犯人权行为的机制是20世纪60年代联合国反对种族隔离运动的一部分。这场运动导致了联合国人权委员会的改革,使其从一个纯粹的“宣传”或警戒机构变成了一个积极授权保护个人免受本国侵犯人权行为之害的机构。委员会的人权制度政治受到“双重标准”和集团间防御的指控的困扰。这篇文章认为,委员会在20世纪60年代的改革及其机制在20世纪70年代的使用方式决定了委员会的政治,导致其最终在21世纪初消亡。关键词:种族隔离;非殖民化;人权;第三世界;联合国大会;联合国人权委员会DOI:10.14712/223363231.2019.17©2019作者。这是一篇根据知识共享署名非商业性非衍生产品许可证条款分发的开放获取文章,该许可证允许在任何媒体上使用、分发和复制,前提是原始作者和来源可信,使用是非商业性的,并且不进行任何修改或改编。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution and Design of Powers at the UN Commission on Human Rights: The Complex Legacy of Anti-Apartheid Activism
The development of mechanisms to target specific countries for human rights abuses was part of the campaign against apartheid at the UN in the 1960s. This campaign led to reform of the UN Commission on Human Rights, which turned it from a purely “promotional” or precatory body into one with an active mandate to protect individuals from human rights abuses perpetrated by their own state. The institutional politics of human rights at the Commission was plagued by claims of “double standards” and inter-bloc defensiveness. This article argues that the reform of the Commission in the 1960s and the way that its mechanisms were used in the 1970s defined the Commission’s politics in a way that led to its eventual demise in the early 2000s. Keywords:  apartheid; decolonization; human rights; Third World; UN General Assembly; UN Commission on Human Rights DOI:  10.14712/23363231.2019.17 © 2019 The Authors. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the  Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License , which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信