确定成人社会护理研究的区域利益相关者知情优先事项:肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯的混合方法研究

Q2 Health Professions
Jolie R. Keemink, R. Sharp, A. Dargan, J. Forder
{"title":"确定成人社会护理研究的区域利益相关者知情优先事项:肯特、萨里和苏塞克斯的混合方法研究","authors":"Jolie R. Keemink, R. Sharp, A. Dargan, J. Forder","doi":"10.31389/jltc.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: There is an urgent need for sustainable change in the social care sector, and research plays an essential role in the identification of priority areas. Thus far, there have been few priority setting exercises within adult social care research. The current study explores regional priorities for adult social care research in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex. Stakeholders were consulted from the starting point of the project, ensuring that the identified research priorities were fully informed by the people that the subsequent research will have an impact on.\nObjectives: Our main aim was to identify research priorities for adult social care within the region, and more specifically, relevant activities within these priority areas that could benefit from evaluation.\nMethods: We employed a mixed-method design using online focus groups with social care professionals (N = 37) and members of the public (N = 7), and an online survey following the focus groups (N = 28). Focus group discussions were informed by themes based on The Care Act 2014.\nFindings: Content analysis was used to analyse discussions, which yielded a list of 46 actionable research questions. Rankings of discussion themes were produced to establish order of importance.\nLimitations: We approached the ranking of priorities only at a higher-order theme level, and not at the level of the specific questions.\nImplications: The extensive list of research questions produced in this study supports social care researchers to conduct studies that address pressing issues for care systems and the public.","PeriodicalId":73807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of long-term care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying Regional Stakeholder-Informed Priorities for Adult Social Care Research: A Mixed-Method Study in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex\",\"authors\":\"Jolie R. Keemink, R. Sharp, A. Dargan, J. Forder\",\"doi\":\"10.31389/jltc.208\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context: There is an urgent need for sustainable change in the social care sector, and research plays an essential role in the identification of priority areas. Thus far, there have been few priority setting exercises within adult social care research. The current study explores regional priorities for adult social care research in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex. Stakeholders were consulted from the starting point of the project, ensuring that the identified research priorities were fully informed by the people that the subsequent research will have an impact on.\\nObjectives: Our main aim was to identify research priorities for adult social care within the region, and more specifically, relevant activities within these priority areas that could benefit from evaluation.\\nMethods: We employed a mixed-method design using online focus groups with social care professionals (N = 37) and members of the public (N = 7), and an online survey following the focus groups (N = 28). Focus group discussions were informed by themes based on The Care Act 2014.\\nFindings: Content analysis was used to analyse discussions, which yielded a list of 46 actionable research questions. Rankings of discussion themes were produced to establish order of importance.\\nLimitations: We approached the ranking of priorities only at a higher-order theme level, and not at the level of the specific questions.\\nImplications: The extensive list of research questions produced in this study supports social care researchers to conduct studies that address pressing issues for care systems and the public.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of long-term care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.208\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of long-term care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31389/jltc.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:社会护理部门迫切需要可持续变革,研究在确定优先领域方面发挥着重要作用。到目前为止,在成人社会护理研究中,很少有优先事项设定练习。目前的研究探讨了肯特郡、萨里和苏塞克斯郡成人社会护理研究的区域优先事项。从项目开始就咨询了利益相关者,确保确定的研究重点得到后续研究将产生影响的人的充分告知。目标:我们的主要目标是确定该地区成人社会护理的研究重点,更具体地说,这些优先领域内可从评价中受益的相关活动。方法:我们采用混合方法设计,使用社会护理专业人员(N=37)和公众(N=7)组成的在线焦点小组,并在焦点小组(N=28)之后进行在线调查。焦点小组讨论根据《2014年护理法》的主题进行。研究结果:内容分析用于分析讨论,产生了46个可操作的研究问题。对讨论主题进行了排名,以确定重要性顺序。局限性:我们只在更高层次的主题层面上对优先事项进行排序,而不是在具体问题的层面上。含义:这项研究中产生的大量研究问题支持社会护理研究人员进行研究,解决护理系统和公众的紧迫问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Identifying Regional Stakeholder-Informed Priorities for Adult Social Care Research: A Mixed-Method Study in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex
Context: There is an urgent need for sustainable change in the social care sector, and research plays an essential role in the identification of priority areas. Thus far, there have been few priority setting exercises within adult social care research. The current study explores regional priorities for adult social care research in Kent, Surrey, and Sussex. Stakeholders were consulted from the starting point of the project, ensuring that the identified research priorities were fully informed by the people that the subsequent research will have an impact on. Objectives: Our main aim was to identify research priorities for adult social care within the region, and more specifically, relevant activities within these priority areas that could benefit from evaluation. Methods: We employed a mixed-method design using online focus groups with social care professionals (N = 37) and members of the public (N = 7), and an online survey following the focus groups (N = 28). Focus group discussions were informed by themes based on The Care Act 2014. Findings: Content analysis was used to analyse discussions, which yielded a list of 46 actionable research questions. Rankings of discussion themes were produced to establish order of importance. Limitations: We approached the ranking of priorities only at a higher-order theme level, and not at the level of the specific questions. Implications: The extensive list of research questions produced in this study supports social care researchers to conduct studies that address pressing issues for care systems and the public.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
33 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信