RANDO体模内热释光剂量测定法对癌症合并乳内结的不同放射治疗技术的比较

Q3 Health Professions
M. T. B. Toosi, Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard, Ashraf Farkhari, F. H. Shandiz, E. Salari
{"title":"RANDO体模内热释光剂量测定法对癌症合并乳内结的不同放射治疗技术的比较","authors":"M. T. B. Toosi, Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard, Ashraf Farkhari, F. H. Shandiz, E. Salari","doi":"10.22038/IJMP.2020.44901.1693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In the various techniques of breast cancer radiotherapy, the presence of the internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in the target volume is important to select the most appropriate technique. This study aimed to compare three radiotherapy techniques with the inclusion of IMNs regarding the dose homogeneity index (DHI) of regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and the dose received by the heart and left lung.Material and Methods: Three techniques were planned on the CT images of the RANDO phantom including wide tangent (WT) contained two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams, oblique parasternal photon (OPP) and oblique parasternal electron (OPE) that included two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams with an anterior oblique 6 MV photon beam and an anterior oblique 15 MeV electron beam added to two tangential beams, respectively. The doses reached to the contoured organs were compared in three techniques by using data gathered from the thermoluminescent dosimetry and treatment planning system.Results: The OPE technique caused a lower absorbed dose for the left IMNs than the other two techniques. For the OPP technique, the dose received by the left lung was higher than the tolerance, and the lung dose in the OPE is slightly lower than the WT technique. The absorbed dose by the heart was lowest for the WT technique and the DHI for this technique was better than the other two techniques.Conclusion: The WT technique showed better results regarding the IMNs and chest wall dose homogeneity distribution and the organ at risk protection.","PeriodicalId":14613,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of various radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer with inclusion of internal mammary nodes by through thermoluminescent dosimetry inside the RANDO phantom\",\"authors\":\"M. T. B. Toosi, Shokouhozaman Soleymanifard, Ashraf Farkhari, F. H. Shandiz, E. Salari\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJMP.2020.44901.1693\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In the various techniques of breast cancer radiotherapy, the presence of the internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in the target volume is important to select the most appropriate technique. This study aimed to compare three radiotherapy techniques with the inclusion of IMNs regarding the dose homogeneity index (DHI) of regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and the dose received by the heart and left lung.Material and Methods: Three techniques were planned on the CT images of the RANDO phantom including wide tangent (WT) contained two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams, oblique parasternal photon (OPP) and oblique parasternal electron (OPE) that included two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams with an anterior oblique 6 MV photon beam and an anterior oblique 15 MeV electron beam added to two tangential beams, respectively. The doses reached to the contoured organs were compared in three techniques by using data gathered from the thermoluminescent dosimetry and treatment planning system.Results: The OPE technique caused a lower absorbed dose for the left IMNs than the other two techniques. For the OPP technique, the dose received by the left lung was higher than the tolerance, and the lung dose in the OPE is slightly lower than the WT technique. The absorbed dose by the heart was lowest for the WT technique and the DHI for this technique was better than the other two techniques.Conclusion: The WT technique showed better results regarding the IMNs and chest wall dose homogeneity distribution and the organ at risk protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.44901.1693\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJMP.2020.44901.1693","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在乳腺癌放疗的各种技术中,靶体积内乳腺内淋巴结(IMNs)的存在对于选择最合适的技术非常重要。本研究旨在比较三种纳入IMNs的放疗技术对区域淋巴结、胸壁的剂量均匀性指数(DHI)以及心脏和左肺接受的剂量。材料和方法:在RANDO幻象的CT图像上计划了三种技术,包括宽切线(WT)包含两个对切6 MV光子束,斜胸骨旁光子(OPP)和斜胸骨旁电子(OPE),包括两个对切6 MV光子束,前斜6 MV光子束和前斜15 MeV电子束分别加入两个切向光束。利用从热释光剂量学和治疗计划系统收集的数据,比较了三种技术中到达轮廓器官的剂量。结果:与其他两种技术相比,OPE技术对左内隐细胞的吸收剂量较低。对于OPP技术,左肺接受的剂量高于耐受量,肺活部肺剂量略低于WT技术。WT技术的心脏吸收剂量最低,DHI优于其他两种技术。结论:WT技术在IMNs和胸壁剂量均匀分布及危险器官保护方面具有较好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of various radiotherapy techniques in breast cancer with inclusion of internal mammary nodes by through thermoluminescent dosimetry inside the RANDO phantom
Introduction: In the various techniques of breast cancer radiotherapy, the presence of the internal mammary nodes (IMNs) in the target volume is important to select the most appropriate technique. This study aimed to compare three radiotherapy techniques with the inclusion of IMNs regarding the dose homogeneity index (DHI) of regional lymph nodes, chest wall, and the dose received by the heart and left lung.Material and Methods: Three techniques were planned on the CT images of the RANDO phantom including wide tangent (WT) contained two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams, oblique parasternal photon (OPP) and oblique parasternal electron (OPE) that included two opposed tangential 6 MV photon beams with an anterior oblique 6 MV photon beam and an anterior oblique 15 MeV electron beam added to two tangential beams, respectively. The doses reached to the contoured organs were compared in three techniques by using data gathered from the thermoluminescent dosimetry and treatment planning system.Results: The OPE technique caused a lower absorbed dose for the left IMNs than the other two techniques. For the OPP technique, the dose received by the left lung was higher than the tolerance, and the lung dose in the OPE is slightly lower than the WT technique. The absorbed dose by the heart was lowest for the WT technique and the DHI for this technique was better than the other two techniques.Conclusion: The WT technique showed better results regarding the IMNs and chest wall dose homogeneity distribution and the organ at risk protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics
Iranian Journal of Medical Physics Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Iranian Journal of Medical Physics (IJMP) is the official scientific bimonthly publication of the Iranian Association of Medical Physicists. IJMP is an international and multidisciplinary journal, peer review, free of charge publication and open access. This journal devoted to publish Original Papers, Review Articles, Short Communications, Technical Notes, Editorial and Letters to the Editor in the field of “Medical Physics” involving both basic and clinical research. Submissions of manuscript from all countries are welcome and will be reviewed by at least two expert reviewers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信