基于扎根理论、模糊DEMATEL和ISM的项目组合选择可持续性标准评估方法

IF 0.8 Q4 MANAGEMENT
Z. Jalilibal, A. Bozorgi-Amiri
{"title":"基于扎根理论、模糊DEMATEL和ISM的项目组合选择可持续性标准评估方法","authors":"Z. Jalilibal, A. Bozorgi-Amiri","doi":"10.22059/IJMS.2021.317127.674399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a set of sustainability criteria is introduced and a hybrid Multi Criteria decision Making (MCDM) method is performed in order to identify and classify a set of criteria for selecting a project portfolio. Proposed criteria based on fuzzy DEMATEL technique in an uncertain environment are assessed to determine the relation among all of the criteria. Moreover, ISM method is used to level the proposed criteria which are effective in the process of selecting the project or not. The results obtained from the proposed method demonstrates that profit, cost, soil, atmosphere, energy, waste and risk criteria are the most effective ones in selecting project portfolio, especially in construction project selection. Furthermore, environmental issues play an important role in the selection of project portfolio while social issues are not as much significant as others. Technical requirement, water, security and public utility are less effective criteria in selecting project portfolio. Also, Biodiversity, social integration and responsibility criteia are the most effected criteria in selecting project portfolio.","PeriodicalId":51913,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A hybrid Grounded Theory, fuzzy DEMATEL and ISM method for Assessment of sustainability criteria for project portfolio selection problems\",\"authors\":\"Z. Jalilibal, A. Bozorgi-Amiri\",\"doi\":\"10.22059/IJMS.2021.317127.674399\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, a set of sustainability criteria is introduced and a hybrid Multi Criteria decision Making (MCDM) method is performed in order to identify and classify a set of criteria for selecting a project portfolio. Proposed criteria based on fuzzy DEMATEL technique in an uncertain environment are assessed to determine the relation among all of the criteria. Moreover, ISM method is used to level the proposed criteria which are effective in the process of selecting the project or not. The results obtained from the proposed method demonstrates that profit, cost, soil, atmosphere, energy, waste and risk criteria are the most effective ones in selecting project portfolio, especially in construction project selection. Furthermore, environmental issues play an important role in the selection of project portfolio while social issues are not as much significant as others. Technical requirement, water, security and public utility are less effective criteria in selecting project portfolio. Also, Biodiversity, social integration and responsibility criteia are the most effected criteria in selecting project portfolio.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2021.317127.674399\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IJMS.2021.317127.674399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,引入了一组可持续性标准,并采用混合多标准决策(MCDM)方法来识别和分类一组用于选择项目组合的标准。在不确定环境中,对基于模糊DEMATEL技术提出的准则进行了评估,以确定所有准则之间的关系。此外,使用ISM方法对所提出的标准进行分级,这些标准在项目选择过程中是否有效。从所提出的方法中获得的结果表明,利润、成本、土壤、大气、能源、废物和风险标准是选择项目组合最有效的标准,尤其是在建设项目选择中。此外,环境问题在项目组合的选择中发挥着重要作用,而社会问题则没有其他问题那么重要。在选择项目组合时,技术要求、水、安全和公用事业是不太有效的标准。此外,生物多样性、社会融合和责任标准是选择项目组合最有效的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A hybrid Grounded Theory, fuzzy DEMATEL and ISM method for Assessment of sustainability criteria for project portfolio selection problems
In this paper, a set of sustainability criteria is introduced and a hybrid Multi Criteria decision Making (MCDM) method is performed in order to identify and classify a set of criteria for selecting a project portfolio. Proposed criteria based on fuzzy DEMATEL technique in an uncertain environment are assessed to determine the relation among all of the criteria. Moreover, ISM method is used to level the proposed criteria which are effective in the process of selecting the project or not. The results obtained from the proposed method demonstrates that profit, cost, soil, atmosphere, energy, waste and risk criteria are the most effective ones in selecting project portfolio, especially in construction project selection. Furthermore, environmental issues play an important role in the selection of project portfolio while social issues are not as much significant as others. Technical requirement, water, security and public utility are less effective criteria in selecting project portfolio. Also, Biodiversity, social integration and responsibility criteia are the most effected criteria in selecting project portfolio.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信