科索沃战争与《华盛顿邮报》:轰炸与结盟

IF 1.7 Q2 COMMUNICATION
Astrid A Fleischer
{"title":"科索沃战争与《华盛顿邮报》:轰炸与结盟","authors":"Astrid A Fleischer","doi":"10.1177/17506352221078015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the alignments on the Kosovo war during the spring of 1999 in the Washington Post newspaper. How did the Washington Post represent the events during Operation Allied Force, NATO’s war against Yugoslavia? How did reporters align themselves with the narrated events? What linguistic and other means signal alignments in the Washington Post discourse on the war? The examined linguistic structures (evaluative vocabulary and agent inclusion/exclusion), the identified themes (in particular, demonization of the Serbs), and the lack of critical voices suggest an alignment with NATO and US government official discourse. The article concludes that the Washington Post did not challenge the dominant national discourse during the Kosovo war.","PeriodicalId":45719,"journal":{"name":"Media War and Conflict","volume":"16 1","pages":"459 - 481"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Kosovo war and the Washington Post: Bombings and alignments\",\"authors\":\"Astrid A Fleischer\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17506352221078015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the alignments on the Kosovo war during the spring of 1999 in the Washington Post newspaper. How did the Washington Post represent the events during Operation Allied Force, NATO’s war against Yugoslavia? How did reporters align themselves with the narrated events? What linguistic and other means signal alignments in the Washington Post discourse on the war? The examined linguistic structures (evaluative vocabulary and agent inclusion/exclusion), the identified themes (in particular, demonization of the Serbs), and the lack of critical voices suggest an alignment with NATO and US government official discourse. The article concludes that the Washington Post did not challenge the dominant national discourse during the Kosovo war.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45719,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"459 - 481\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Media War and Conflict\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352221078015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Media War and Conflict","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352221078015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章探讨了1999年春天《华盛顿邮报》对科索沃战争的看法。《华盛顿邮报》是如何描述盟军行动(北约对南斯拉夫的战争)中的事件的?记者是如何使自己与所叙述的事件保持一致的?在《华盛顿邮报》关于战争的论述中,哪些语言和其他手段表明了立场?研究的语言结构(评价词汇和主体包容/排除),确定的主题(特别是塞尔维亚人的妖魔化),以及缺乏批评声音表明与北约和美国政府的官方话语一致。这篇文章的结论是,《华盛顿邮报》在科索沃战争期间没有挑战占主导地位的国家话语。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Kosovo war and the Washington Post: Bombings and alignments
This article explores the alignments on the Kosovo war during the spring of 1999 in the Washington Post newspaper. How did the Washington Post represent the events during Operation Allied Force, NATO’s war against Yugoslavia? How did reporters align themselves with the narrated events? What linguistic and other means signal alignments in the Washington Post discourse on the war? The examined linguistic structures (evaluative vocabulary and agent inclusion/exclusion), the identified themes (in particular, demonization of the Serbs), and the lack of critical voices suggest an alignment with NATO and US government official discourse. The article concludes that the Washington Post did not challenge the dominant national discourse during the Kosovo war.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Media War and Conflict
Media War and Conflict COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Media, War & Conflict is a major new international, peer-reviewed journal that maps the shifting arena of war, conflict and terrorism in an intensively and extensively mediated age. It will explore cultural, political and technological transformations in media-military relations, journalistic practices, and new media, and their impact on policy, publics, and outcomes of warfare. Media, War & Conflict is the first journal to be dedicated to this field. It will publish substantial research articles, shorter pieces, book reviews, letters and commentary, and will include an images section devoted to visual aspects of war and conflict.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信