{"title":"预测建模:通过验证技术的评估","authors":"M. Jeelani, F. Danish, Saquib Khan","doi":"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Modelling: An Assessment Through Validation Techniques\",\"authors\":\"M. Jeelani, F. Danish, Saquib Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在本研究中,对模拟对称和非对称数据进行了各种统计模型的拟合。模型的拟合是借助R studio中的各种库进行的,模型的拟合也使用了各种选择标准。为了评估不同的验证技术,将模拟数据分为训练数据集和测试数据集,并在R中开发了各种用于验证的函数。系数总结显示,所有统计模型在对称分布和非对称分布中都具有统计学显著性。初步分析发现,在对称分布和非对称分布中,TFEM (Type First Exponential Model)是最佳的线性模型,RMSE、MAE、BIAS、AIC和BIC值都较低。在非线性模型中,Haung模型具有较低的RMSE、MAE等值,是两种分布下的最佳模型。在本研究中使用了不同的验证技术。预测错误率较低,5折交叉验证在所有统计模型中表现更好。
Predictive Modelling: An Assessment Through Validation Techniques
In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.