预测建模:通过验证技术的评估

Pub Date : 2022-02-14 DOI:10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513
M. Jeelani, F. Danish, Saquib Khan
{"title":"预测建模:通过验证技术的评估","authors":"M. Jeelani, F. Danish, Saquib Khan","doi":"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive Modelling: An Assessment Through Validation Techniques\",\"authors\":\"M. Jeelani, F. Danish, Saquib Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/jrss0974-8024.1513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,对模拟对称和非对称数据进行了各种统计模型的拟合。模型的拟合是借助R studio中的各种库进行的,模型的拟合也使用了各种选择标准。为了评估不同的验证技术,将模拟数据分为训练数据集和测试数据集,并在R中开发了各种用于验证的函数。系数总结显示,所有统计模型在对称分布和非对称分布中都具有统计学显著性。初步分析发现,在对称分布和非对称分布中,TFEM (Type First Exponential Model)是最佳的线性模型,RMSE、MAE、BIAS、AIC和BIC值都较低。在非线性模型中,Haung模型具有较低的RMSE、MAE等值,是两种分布下的最佳模型。在本研究中使用了不同的验证技术。预测错误率较低,5折交叉验证在所有统计模型中表现更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享
查看原文
Predictive Modelling: An Assessment Through Validation Techniques
In this investigation, various statistical models were fitted on simulated symmetric and asymmetric data. Fitting of models was carried out with the help of various libraries in R studio, and various selection criteria were also used while fitting of models. In order to evaluate different validation techniques the simulated data was divided in training and testing data set and various functions in R were developed for the purpose of validation. Coefficient summary revealed that all statistical models were statistically significant across both symmetric as well as asymmetric distributions. In preliminary analysis TFEM (Type First Exponential Model) was found out to be the best linear model across both symmetric and asymmetric distributions with lower values of RMSE, MAE, BIAS, AIC and BIC. Among non-linear models, Haung model was found out to be best model across both the distributions as it has lower values of RMSE, MAE etc. Different validation techniques were used in the present study. Lower rates of prediction error in comparison to its counter parts, 5-folded cross validation performed better across all the statistical models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信