约旦河西岸北部/巴勒斯坦公立学校中学生的压力应对策略

M. Al-Tell, Khulud Mansor
{"title":"约旦河西岸北部/巴勒斯坦公立学校中学生的压力应对策略","authors":"M. Al-Tell, Khulud Mansor","doi":"10.21106/IJTMRPH.78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background or Objectives: All humans by nature cope with stressors by using productive and non-productive coping strategies. Adolescents and students in particular experience stress mainly due to academic examinations but the strategies adopted by students in the West Bank/Palestine are largely unknown and understudied. This study examines stress-coping strategies adopted by general secondary school-aged students in government schools in Northern West Bank. \nMethods: This is a quantitative designed study of 334 students selected from 39 schools utilizing a stratified random sampling method. A self-reporting questionnaire composed of Brief Coping Orientation of Problems Experienced (COPE) was used to identify stress management methods among the students. A scale consisting of 14 domains representing 28 coping methods was created with the following 4-likert-scale response choices: 1) \"I haven't been doing this at all,\" 2) \"I've been doing this a little bit,\" 3) \"I've been doing this a medium amount,\" and 4) \"I've been doing this a lot.\" Respondents reported their views scoring them from 1-4; the mean for each method was calculated and ranged from scores 2-6. \nResults: In all, religion (6.30±1.6,1) and planning (6.11±1.35) methods were the predominant domains of coping methods used by majority of the students. Problem-focused and emotion-focused coping methods were used more than the \"less-useful\" coping methods more among females than by their male counterparts. The \"use of instrumental support,\" \"denial,\" and \"behavioral disengagement\" were methods used more by students in the humanities than their counterparts in the scientific branches. \nConclusion and Implications for Translation: Almost all of the students have different levels of stress with different effects. The useful (i.e., \"problem-focused\" and \"emotion-focused\") coping methods were mostly used by students, and the \"less useful\" coping once were used a \"little bit.\" Religion and planning were the predominant coping methods used by students. It is recommended that schools should emphasize on the use of useful evidence-base coping methods to deal with their stress. \nKeywords: • Stress • Coping • Coping methods • Secondary schools • Students \n  \n© 2019 Al-Tell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.","PeriodicalId":93768,"journal":{"name":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stress Coping Strategies Among Secondary School-Aged Students in Government Schools in Northern West Bank/Palestine\",\"authors\":\"M. Al-Tell, Khulud Mansor\",\"doi\":\"10.21106/IJTMRPH.78\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background or Objectives: All humans by nature cope with stressors by using productive and non-productive coping strategies. Adolescents and students in particular experience stress mainly due to academic examinations but the strategies adopted by students in the West Bank/Palestine are largely unknown and understudied. This study examines stress-coping strategies adopted by general secondary school-aged students in government schools in Northern West Bank. \\nMethods: This is a quantitative designed study of 334 students selected from 39 schools utilizing a stratified random sampling method. A self-reporting questionnaire composed of Brief Coping Orientation of Problems Experienced (COPE) was used to identify stress management methods among the students. A scale consisting of 14 domains representing 28 coping methods was created with the following 4-likert-scale response choices: 1) \\\"I haven't been doing this at all,\\\" 2) \\\"I've been doing this a little bit,\\\" 3) \\\"I've been doing this a medium amount,\\\" and 4) \\\"I've been doing this a lot.\\\" Respondents reported their views scoring them from 1-4; the mean for each method was calculated and ranged from scores 2-6. \\nResults: In all, religion (6.30±1.6,1) and planning (6.11±1.35) methods were the predominant domains of coping methods used by majority of the students. Problem-focused and emotion-focused coping methods were used more than the \\\"less-useful\\\" coping methods more among females than by their male counterparts. The \\\"use of instrumental support,\\\" \\\"denial,\\\" and \\\"behavioral disengagement\\\" were methods used more by students in the humanities than their counterparts in the scientific branches. \\nConclusion and Implications for Translation: Almost all of the students have different levels of stress with different effects. The useful (i.e., \\\"problem-focused\\\" and \\\"emotion-focused\\\") coping methods were mostly used by students, and the \\\"less useful\\\" coping once were used a \\\"little bit.\\\" Religion and planning were the predominant coping methods used by students. It is recommended that schools should emphasize on the use of useful evidence-base coping methods to deal with their stress. \\nKeywords: • Stress • Coping • Coping methods • Secondary schools • Students \\n  \\n© 2019 Al-Tell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of translational medical research and public health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of translational medical research and public health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21106/IJTMRPH.78\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of translational medical research and public health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21106/IJTMRPH.78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景或目的:所有人天生都通过使用有效和非有效的应对策略来应对压力源。青少年和学生尤其感到压力,这主要是由于学术考试,但西岸/巴勒斯坦学生所采取的战略在很大程度上是未知的,也没有得到充分的研究。本研究考察了西岸北部公立学校普通中学适龄学生采用的压力应对策略。方法:采用分层随机抽样的方法,对39所学校的334名学生进行定量设计研究。采用“遇到问题的简短应对倾向”(COPE)自述问卷,对大学生的压力管理方法进行调查。一个由14个领域组成的量表,代表28种应对方法,并创建了以下4李克特量表回答选项:“我根本就没这么做过。”“我做过一点。”“我经常这样做。”“我做了很多次。”受访者的观点从1-4分;计算每种方法的平均值,得分范围为2-6分。结果:宗教方法(6.30±1.6,1)和计划方法(6.11±1.35)是大多数学生使用的主要应对方法。以问题为中心和以情绪为中心的应对方法在女性中比在男性中使用得更多,而不是“不太有用”的应对方法。“使用工具支持”、“否认”和“行为脱离”是人文学科学生比科学学科学生更多使用的方法。结论和启示:几乎所有的学生都有不同程度的压力和不同的影响。有用的(即“以问题为中心”和“以情绪为中心”)应对方法大多被学生使用,而“不太有用”的应对方法只有“一点点”使用。宗教和计划是学生使用的主要应对方法。建议学校应强调使用有用的循证应对方法来处理他们的压力。关键词:•压力•应对•应对方法•中学•学生©2019 al - tell et al。这是一篇根据知识共享署名许可协议发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stress Coping Strategies Among Secondary School-Aged Students in Government Schools in Northern West Bank/Palestine
Background or Objectives: All humans by nature cope with stressors by using productive and non-productive coping strategies. Adolescents and students in particular experience stress mainly due to academic examinations but the strategies adopted by students in the West Bank/Palestine are largely unknown and understudied. This study examines stress-coping strategies adopted by general secondary school-aged students in government schools in Northern West Bank. Methods: This is a quantitative designed study of 334 students selected from 39 schools utilizing a stratified random sampling method. A self-reporting questionnaire composed of Brief Coping Orientation of Problems Experienced (COPE) was used to identify stress management methods among the students. A scale consisting of 14 domains representing 28 coping methods was created with the following 4-likert-scale response choices: 1) "I haven't been doing this at all," 2) "I've been doing this a little bit," 3) "I've been doing this a medium amount," and 4) "I've been doing this a lot." Respondents reported their views scoring them from 1-4; the mean for each method was calculated and ranged from scores 2-6. Results: In all, religion (6.30±1.6,1) and planning (6.11±1.35) methods were the predominant domains of coping methods used by majority of the students. Problem-focused and emotion-focused coping methods were used more than the "less-useful" coping methods more among females than by their male counterparts. The "use of instrumental support," "denial," and "behavioral disengagement" were methods used more by students in the humanities than their counterparts in the scientific branches. Conclusion and Implications for Translation: Almost all of the students have different levels of stress with different effects. The useful (i.e., "problem-focused" and "emotion-focused") coping methods were mostly used by students, and the "less useful" coping once were used a "little bit." Religion and planning were the predominant coping methods used by students. It is recommended that schools should emphasize on the use of useful evidence-base coping methods to deal with their stress. Keywords: • Stress • Coping • Coping methods • Secondary schools • Students   © 2019 Al-Tell et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信