{"title":"书评:《让它发挥作用:中华人民共和国早期的统计与治国方略》","authors":"D. Plekhanov","doi":"10.1177/0920203X211019702f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"pertinent academic thinking in the area, especially that by non-Western writers. In particular, Liao’s nuanced reading of the role of network capitalism, the blurring of producer and consumer categories, and the potential of the commons within shanzhai culture and practice is to be celebrated. Whilst many aspects of the empirical work undertaken may be of interest to undergraduate students in the fields of cultural studies, sociology, or marketing, the main audience for this book is likely to be a postgraduate one. Shanzhai and the socioeconomic issues surrounding it are a very specific case study that requires more than a passing knowledge of China. Although Liao brings into play aspects of Chinese history, such as Mao’s ‘iron rice bowl’ and Deng’s ‘leaping into the sea’ in a very accessible way, it is easy to underestimate the body of historical and cultural knowledge that this book draws upon. Although knowledge is not assumed, a grasp on the key moments in contemporary Chinese history would certainly aid a deeper understanding of the content. So, whilst it is written in a very accessible and engaging way, Liao’s book is more likely to be relevant to a postgraduate audience. This by no means detracts from its numerous merits.","PeriodicalId":45809,"journal":{"name":"China Information","volume":"35 1","pages":"248 - 249"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0920203X211019702f","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book review: Making It Count: Statistics and Statecraft in the Early People’s Republic of China\",\"authors\":\"D. Plekhanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0920203X211019702f\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"pertinent academic thinking in the area, especially that by non-Western writers. In particular, Liao’s nuanced reading of the role of network capitalism, the blurring of producer and consumer categories, and the potential of the commons within shanzhai culture and practice is to be celebrated. Whilst many aspects of the empirical work undertaken may be of interest to undergraduate students in the fields of cultural studies, sociology, or marketing, the main audience for this book is likely to be a postgraduate one. Shanzhai and the socioeconomic issues surrounding it are a very specific case study that requires more than a passing knowledge of China. Although Liao brings into play aspects of Chinese history, such as Mao’s ‘iron rice bowl’ and Deng’s ‘leaping into the sea’ in a very accessible way, it is easy to underestimate the body of historical and cultural knowledge that this book draws upon. Although knowledge is not assumed, a grasp on the key moments in contemporary Chinese history would certainly aid a deeper understanding of the content. So, whilst it is written in a very accessible and engaging way, Liao’s book is more likely to be relevant to a postgraduate audience. This by no means detracts from its numerous merits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Information\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"248 - 249\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0920203X211019702f\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211019702f\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Information","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X211019702f","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Book review: Making It Count: Statistics and Statecraft in the Early People’s Republic of China
pertinent academic thinking in the area, especially that by non-Western writers. In particular, Liao’s nuanced reading of the role of network capitalism, the blurring of producer and consumer categories, and the potential of the commons within shanzhai culture and practice is to be celebrated. Whilst many aspects of the empirical work undertaken may be of interest to undergraduate students in the fields of cultural studies, sociology, or marketing, the main audience for this book is likely to be a postgraduate one. Shanzhai and the socioeconomic issues surrounding it are a very specific case study that requires more than a passing knowledge of China. Although Liao brings into play aspects of Chinese history, such as Mao’s ‘iron rice bowl’ and Deng’s ‘leaping into the sea’ in a very accessible way, it is easy to underestimate the body of historical and cultural knowledge that this book draws upon. Although knowledge is not assumed, a grasp on the key moments in contemporary Chinese history would certainly aid a deeper understanding of the content. So, whilst it is written in a very accessible and engaging way, Liao’s book is more likely to be relevant to a postgraduate audience. This by no means detracts from its numerous merits.
期刊介绍:
China Information presents timely and in-depth analyses of major developments in contemporary China and overseas Chinese communities in the areas of politics, economics, law, ecology, culture, and society, including literature and the arts. China Information pays special attention to views and areas that do not receive sufficient attention in the mainstream discourse on contemporary China. It encourages discussion and debate between different academic traditions, offers a platform to express controversial and dissenting opinions, and promotes research that is historically sensitive and contemporarily relevant.