口译员在执行职能方面的优势?

IF 1.8 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Soudabeh Nour, E. Struys, Evy Woumans, Illy Hollebeke, H. Stengers
{"title":"口译员在执行职能方面的优势?","authors":"Soudabeh Nour, E. Struys, Evy Woumans, Illy Hollebeke, H. Stengers","doi":"10.1075/INTP.00045.NOU","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this systematic literature review was to answer the question of which executive function is most affected by interpreter training and experience. We used the ‘unity and diversity’ framework of executive functions to distinguish between three executive components: Response and Distractor Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating. Among the seventeen studies included in the review, we only found evidence for an interpreter advantage on Shifting and Updating, but with a different pattern for each of these. With regard to Updating, groups of interpreters scored better than comparison groups, but general trend in longitudinal studies did not show an improvement for interpreter trainees. In contrast, for Shifting, scores improved as a result of interpreting training. Our systematic review stresses the importance of understanding the diversity of executive processes when investigating the relationship between interpreting and cognitive performance.","PeriodicalId":51746,"journal":{"name":"Interpreting","volume":"22 1","pages":"163-186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An interpreter advantage in executive functions?\",\"authors\":\"Soudabeh Nour, E. Struys, Evy Woumans, Illy Hollebeke, H. Stengers\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/INTP.00045.NOU\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The aim of this systematic literature review was to answer the question of which executive function is most affected by interpreter training and experience. We used the ‘unity and diversity’ framework of executive functions to distinguish between three executive components: Response and Distractor Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating. Among the seventeen studies included in the review, we only found evidence for an interpreter advantage on Shifting and Updating, but with a different pattern for each of these. With regard to Updating, groups of interpreters scored better than comparison groups, but general trend in longitudinal studies did not show an improvement for interpreter trainees. In contrast, for Shifting, scores improved as a result of interpreting training. Our systematic review stresses the importance of understanding the diversity of executive processes when investigating the relationship between interpreting and cognitive performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interpreting\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"163-186\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interpreting\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.00045.NOU\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interpreting","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/INTP.00045.NOU","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本系统文献综述的目的是回答口译员培训和经验对哪种执行功能影响最大的问题。我们使用执行功能的“统一性和多样性”框架来区分三个执行组成部分:反应和分心抑制、转换和更新。在综述中包括的17项研究中,我们只发现了口译员在转换和更新方面的优势,但每项研究的模式都不同。关于更新,口译员组的得分高于对照组,但纵向研究的总体趋势并没有显示口译员受训人员的进步。相比之下,对于Shifting,由于口译培训,成绩有所提高。我们的系统综述强调了在研究口译和认知表现之间的关系时,理解执行过程多样性的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An interpreter advantage in executive functions?
Abstract The aim of this systematic literature review was to answer the question of which executive function is most affected by interpreter training and experience. We used the ‘unity and diversity’ framework of executive functions to distinguish between three executive components: Response and Distractor Inhibition, Shifting, and Updating. Among the seventeen studies included in the review, we only found evidence for an interpreter advantage on Shifting and Updating, but with a different pattern for each of these. With regard to Updating, groups of interpreters scored better than comparison groups, but general trend in longitudinal studies did not show an improvement for interpreter trainees. In contrast, for Shifting, scores improved as a result of interpreting training. Our systematic review stresses the importance of understanding the diversity of executive processes when investigating the relationship between interpreting and cognitive performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interpreting
Interpreting Multiple-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.80%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Interpreting serves as a medium for research and debate on all aspects of interpreting, in its various modes, modalities (spoken and signed) and settings (conferences, media, courtroom, healthcare and others). Striving to promote our understanding of the socio-cultural, cognitive and linguistic dimensions of interpreting as an activity and process, the journal covers theoretical and methodological concerns, explores the history and professional ecology of interpreting and its role in society, and addresses current issues in professional practice and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信