扩展世界中的国际法教学与研究:从印度人的角度理解

Q4 Social Sciences
S. Sarker, Prakash Sharma
{"title":"扩展世界中的国际法教学与研究:从印度人的角度理解","authors":"S. Sarker, Prakash Sharma","doi":"10.5102/rdi.v19i2.8580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the basis for transterritoriality as a theory to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations and attempts to its application in two Business and Human Rights leading decisions: Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc v. Lungowe and Ors. [2019] UKSC 20 and Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5 . By the analysis of both jud-gements, issued by two Supreme Courts under the common law regime, the present work aims to prove that, in order to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations, national judges can apply private international law, public international law and international human rights law in an heterarchical and transversal manner to ensure a genuine dialogue between national jurisdictions and international courts under the application of the main principles and rules of international law. Qualitative and deductive methods used were based on interdisciplinary research and primary and secondary business and human rights sources were consulted to develop the proposed theory and case analysis.","PeriodicalId":37377,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teaching and research of International Law in an expanded world: understanding from the Indian perspective\",\"authors\":\"S. Sarker, Prakash Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.5102/rdi.v19i2.8580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines the basis for transterritoriality as a theory to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations and attempts to its application in two Business and Human Rights leading decisions: Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc v. Lungowe and Ors. [2019] UKSC 20 and Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5 . By the analysis of both jud-gements, issued by two Supreme Courts under the common law regime, the present work aims to prove that, in order to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations, national judges can apply private international law, public international law and international human rights law in an heterarchical and transversal manner to ensure a genuine dialogue between national jurisdictions and international courts under the application of the main principles and rules of international law. Qualitative and deductive methods used were based on interdisciplinary research and primary and secondary business and human rights sources were consulted to develop the proposed theory and case analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37377,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v19i2.8580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v19i2.8580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了跨地域性作为追究公司侵犯人权责任的理论的基础,并试图将其应用于两项商业和人权主导的裁决:韦丹塔资源公司和孔科拉铜矿公司诉伦戈韦和奥尔斯案。【2019】UKSC 20和Nevsun Resources有限公司诉Araya,2020 SCC 5。通过对两个最高法院在普通法制度下发布的两项裁决的分析,本工作旨在证明,为了追究公司对侵犯人权行为的责任,国家法官可以适用国际私法,国际公法和国际人权法,确保国家司法机构和国际法院在适用国际法主要原则和规则的情况下进行真正的对话。所使用的定性和演绎方法基于跨学科研究,并咨询了中小企业和人权来源,以发展所提出的理论和案例分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teaching and research of International Law in an expanded world: understanding from the Indian perspective
This paper examines the basis for transterritoriality as a theory to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations and attempts to its application in two Business and Human Rights leading decisions: Vedanta Resources Plc and Konkola Copper Mines Plc v. Lungowe and Ors. [2019] UKSC 20 and Nevsun Resources Ltd. v. Araya, 2020 SCC 5 . By the analysis of both jud-gements, issued by two Supreme Courts under the common law regime, the present work aims to prove that, in order to hold corporations accountable for human rights violations, national judges can apply private international law, public international law and international human rights law in an heterarchical and transversal manner to ensure a genuine dialogue between national jurisdictions and international courts under the application of the main principles and rules of international law. Qualitative and deductive methods used were based on interdisciplinary research and primary and secondary business and human rights sources were consulted to develop the proposed theory and case analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of International Law (RDI) was created as a tool for select and publish academic papers related to issues addressed by public and private international law. The Journal has a good ranking according with the Brazilian system (Qualis A1). In the quest for development and construction of critical views about international law, the Brazilian Journal of International Law has two main focus: 1. International protection of the human person: covers issues related to international environmental law, humanitarian law, internationalization of law, in addition to research on the evolution of the law of treaties as a way of expanding the contemporary international law. 2. System of legal integration: regional integration (European Union, Mercorsur, NAFTA, ASEAN), sectoral integration (WTO, ICSID), and others. Thematic issues: We intend to publish thematic issues. It aims to increase interest in the journal and its impact on the area. We apologize to the authors, but articles on other subjects will not be accepted or should expect the numbers on topics related to being appreciated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信