工作机器人化得好!-在管理技术变革时保持任务的多样性和幸福感

IF 7.5 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Tuuli Turja , Tuomo Särkikoski , Pertti Koistinen , Oxana Krutova , Harri Melin
{"title":"工作机器人化得好!-在管理技术变革时保持任务的多样性和幸福感","authors":"Tuuli Turja ,&nbsp;Tuomo Särkikoski ,&nbsp;Pertti Koistinen ,&nbsp;Oxana Krutova ,&nbsp;Harri Melin","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In an era of emerging service work robotization, this article investigates how workers perceive job diversity in robotized work, and how those perceptions relate to job satisfaction and the perceived meaningfulness of a job. The study used a nationwide Quality of Work Life survey (QWLS) data collected in Finland in 2018 (N = 4110), and its subsample of salary earners working in a robotized workplace at the time of the study (n = 535). The data were analyzed using a correlative cross-sectional study design, descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and OLS regression analysis. Against a common belief and previous studies, the findings show that intrinsic job satisfaction at work is on the average lower in robotized workplaces than in nonrobotized workplaces. The aggregate higher job satisfaction and perceived meaningfulness of work were mostly associated with perceived task diversity depending on whether, or how extensively, the employee worked with robots. The study contributes to the scientific robotization discussions with unique empirical evidence of job diversity and well-being. Moreover, the study produces information for working life, organizations, and change management by disclosing the importance of maintaining job diversity in and after implementing technological changes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48290,"journal":{"name":"European Management Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000949/pdfft?md5=cdbe484a2efb0640ccc4deca72d5b006&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322000949-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Job well robotized! – Maintaining task diversity and well-being in managing technological changes\",\"authors\":\"Tuuli Turja ,&nbsp;Tuomo Särkikoski ,&nbsp;Pertti Koistinen ,&nbsp;Oxana Krutova ,&nbsp;Harri Melin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.emj.2022.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In an era of emerging service work robotization, this article investigates how workers perceive job diversity in robotized work, and how those perceptions relate to job satisfaction and the perceived meaningfulness of a job. The study used a nationwide Quality of Work Life survey (QWLS) data collected in Finland in 2018 (N = 4110), and its subsample of salary earners working in a robotized workplace at the time of the study (n = 535). The data were analyzed using a correlative cross-sectional study design, descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and OLS regression analysis. Against a common belief and previous studies, the findings show that intrinsic job satisfaction at work is on the average lower in robotized workplaces than in nonrobotized workplaces. The aggregate higher job satisfaction and perceived meaningfulness of work were mostly associated with perceived task diversity depending on whether, or how extensively, the employee worked with robots. The study contributes to the scientific robotization discussions with unique empirical evidence of job diversity and well-being. Moreover, the study produces information for working life, organizations, and change management by disclosing the importance of maintaining job diversity in and after implementing technological changes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Management Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000949/pdfft?md5=cdbe484a2efb0640ccc4deca72d5b006&pid=1-s2.0-S0263237322000949-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Management Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000949\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263237322000949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在一个新兴的服务工作机器人化时代,本文调查了工人如何看待机器人化工作中的工作多样性,以及这些看法与工作满意度和工作意义感知之间的关系。研究使用了2018年在芬兰收集的全国范围内的工作生活质量调查(QWLS)数据(N = 4110),以及研究时在机器人化工作场所工作的工薪族子样本(N = 535)。数据分析采用了相关横截面研究设计、描述性统计、方差分析和 OLS 回归分析。与人们的普遍看法和以往的研究不同,研究结果表明,机器人化工作场所的内在工作满意度平均低于非机器人化工作场所。总体较高的工作满意度和感知到的工作意义大多与感知到的任务多样性有关,这取决于员工是否使用机器人工作,或者使用机器人的范围有多大。这项研究为机器人化的科学讨论提供了有关工作多样性和幸福感的独特经验证据。此外,这项研究还揭示了在实施技术变革的过程中和之后保持工作多样性的重要性,从而为工作生活、组织和变革管理提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Job well robotized! – Maintaining task diversity and well-being in managing technological changes

In an era of emerging service work robotization, this article investigates how workers perceive job diversity in robotized work, and how those perceptions relate to job satisfaction and the perceived meaningfulness of a job. The study used a nationwide Quality of Work Life survey (QWLS) data collected in Finland in 2018 (N = 4110), and its subsample of salary earners working in a robotized workplace at the time of the study (n = 535). The data were analyzed using a correlative cross-sectional study design, descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and OLS regression analysis. Against a common belief and previous studies, the findings show that intrinsic job satisfaction at work is on the average lower in robotized workplaces than in nonrobotized workplaces. The aggregate higher job satisfaction and perceived meaningfulness of work were mostly associated with perceived task diversity depending on whether, or how extensively, the employee worked with robots. The study contributes to the scientific robotization discussions with unique empirical evidence of job diversity and well-being. Moreover, the study produces information for working life, organizations, and change management by disclosing the importance of maintaining job diversity in and after implementing technological changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: The European Management Journal (EMJ) stands as a premier scholarly publication, disseminating cutting-edge research spanning all realms of management. EMJ articles challenge conventional wisdom through rigorously informed empirical and theoretical inquiries, offering fresh insights and innovative perspectives on key management themes while remaining accessible and engaging for a wide readership. EMJ articles embody intellectual curiosity and embrace diverse methodological approaches, yielding contributions that significantly influence both management theory and practice. We actively seek interdisciplinary research that integrates distinct research traditions to illuminate contemporary challenges within the expansive domain of European business and management. We strongly encourage cross-cultural investigations addressing the unique challenges faced by European management scholarship and practice in navigating global issues and contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信