墨西哥2018年总统竞选中的性别议程

Gilberto Morales
{"title":"墨西哥2018年总统竞选中的性别议程","authors":"Gilberto Morales","doi":"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2018v27n59/morales","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes gender related issues posed by three presidential candidates nominated by partisan coalitions in the 2018 elections. The coalition’s electoral platforms were reviewed and, drawing from journalistic information, a data base was constructed in which all of Lopez  Obrador’s, Meade’s and Anaya’s events during their campaigns were registered. The main conclusion is that, in their agendas, the topics of gender from a distributive approach that reinforces traditional roles for women are predominant. In a parallel way, various feminist and lgbt+ collectives presented agendas for equality, which have been as a consequence represented by alternative communities.","PeriodicalId":34371,"journal":{"name":"Alteridades","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agendas de género en las campañas presidenciales de 2018 en México\",\"authors\":\"Gilberto Morales\",\"doi\":\"10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2018v27n59/morales\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes gender related issues posed by three presidential candidates nominated by partisan coalitions in the 2018 elections. The coalition’s electoral platforms were reviewed and, drawing from journalistic information, a data base was constructed in which all of Lopez  Obrador’s, Meade’s and Anaya’s events during their campaigns were registered. The main conclusion is that, in their agendas, the topics of gender from a distributive approach that reinforces traditional roles for women are predominant. In a parallel way, various feminist and lgbt+ collectives presented agendas for equality, which have been as a consequence represented by alternative communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34371,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alteridades\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alteridades\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2018v27n59/morales\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alteridades","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/alteridades/2018v27n59/morales","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了在2018年选举中由党派联盟提名的三位总统候选人提出的性别相关问题。对联盟的选举平台进行了审查,并根据新闻信息建立了一个数据库,登记了洛佩斯·奥夫拉多尔、米德和阿纳亚在竞选期间的所有活动。主要结论是,在他们的议程中,从强化妇女传统角色的分配方法出发的性别问题占主导地位。与此同时,各种女权主义和lgbt+集体提出了平等议程,因此,另类社区代表了这些议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agendas de género en las campañas presidenciales de 2018 en México
This article analyzes gender related issues posed by three presidential candidates nominated by partisan coalitions in the 2018 elections. The coalition’s electoral platforms were reviewed and, drawing from journalistic information, a data base was constructed in which all of Lopez  Obrador’s, Meade’s and Anaya’s events during their campaigns were registered. The main conclusion is that, in their agendas, the topics of gender from a distributive approach that reinforces traditional roles for women are predominant. In a parallel way, various feminist and lgbt+ collectives presented agendas for equality, which have been as a consequence represented by alternative communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
54 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信