卫生技术评估中的价值判断:一个应用伦理学决策范式

Georges-Auguste Legault, S. K. Bédard, Jean-Pierre Béland, C. Bellemare, L. Bernier, P. Dagenais, Charles-Étienne Daniel, Hubert Gagnon, Monelle Parent, J. Patenaude
{"title":"卫生技术评估中的价值判断:一个应用伦理学决策范式","authors":"Georges-Auguste Legault, S. K. Bédard, Jean-Pierre Béland, C. Bellemare, L. Bernier, P. Dagenais, Charles-Étienne Daniel, Hubert Gagnon, Monelle Parent, J. Patenaude","doi":"10.4236/OJPP.2021.112021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has shed more light on the difficulty of \nmaking health care decisions integrating scientific knowledge and values \nassociated to life and death issues, human suffering, quality of life, economic \nlosses, liberty of movement, etc. But the difficulties related to health care \ndecisions and the use of innovative drugs or technologies are not new, and many \ncountries have created agencies that have the mandate to evaluate new \ntechnologies in health care. Health Technological Assessment (HTA) reports’ aim \nis to guide the decision makers in these difficult matters. There are two \nethical components in HTA. The first is the report’s presentation of an ethical \nevaluation of the technology. The second is the value-ladenness of the HTA \ndecision-making process itself. When implicit value judgments are not elicited, \nthe justification of the final decision cannot be transparent. The present \npaper aims to identify and elicit the implicit value-judgments related to each \nstep of the HTA process. This research is grounded on an applied ethics decision-making paradigm based on the role of value judgments in \nthe decision-making process. The first part discusses two different approaches \nto values and value judgments in HTA. In the second part, citations mentioning \nvalue judgments extracted from a systematic review on the integration of ethics \ninto HTA were categorized to elicit the value judgments and their criteria for \neach different HTA decision-making steps. The results show that there are 18 \ndecision-making steps in the HTA process where 23 implicit value-judgments can \nbe recognized. The range of these value judgments encompasses the whole \nHTA process: from the initial request, the presenting of the principal issues, \nto the final report’s dissemination. Since stakeholders need to understand \nwhich value judgments the conclusion of a report relies on, eliciting the \nimplicit value judgments in the HTA decision-making process should yield more \ntransparency.","PeriodicalId":91152,"journal":{"name":"Open journal of philosophy","volume":"11 1","pages":"307-325"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eliciting Value-Judgments in Health Technology Assessment: An Applied Ethics Decision Making Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Georges-Auguste Legault, S. K. Bédard, Jean-Pierre Béland, C. Bellemare, L. Bernier, P. Dagenais, Charles-Étienne Daniel, Hubert Gagnon, Monelle Parent, J. Patenaude\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJPP.2021.112021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has shed more light on the difficulty of \\nmaking health care decisions integrating scientific knowledge and values \\nassociated to life and death issues, human suffering, quality of life, economic \\nlosses, liberty of movement, etc. But the difficulties related to health care \\ndecisions and the use of innovative drugs or technologies are not new, and many \\ncountries have created agencies that have the mandate to evaluate new \\ntechnologies in health care. Health Technological Assessment (HTA) reports’ aim \\nis to guide the decision makers in these difficult matters. There are two \\nethical components in HTA. The first is the report’s presentation of an ethical \\nevaluation of the technology. The second is the value-ladenness of the HTA \\ndecision-making process itself. When implicit value judgments are not elicited, \\nthe justification of the final decision cannot be transparent. The present \\npaper aims to identify and elicit the implicit value-judgments related to each \\nstep of the HTA process. This research is grounded on an applied ethics decision-making paradigm based on the role of value judgments in \\nthe decision-making process. The first part discusses two different approaches \\nto values and value judgments in HTA. In the second part, citations mentioning \\nvalue judgments extracted from a systematic review on the integration of ethics \\ninto HTA were categorized to elicit the value judgments and their criteria for \\neach different HTA decision-making steps. The results show that there are 18 \\ndecision-making steps in the HTA process where 23 implicit value-judgments can \\nbe recognized. The range of these value judgments encompasses the whole \\nHTA process: from the initial request, the presenting of the principal issues, \\nto the final report’s dissemination. Since stakeholders need to understand \\nwhich value judgments the conclusion of a report relies on, eliciting the \\nimplicit value judgments in the HTA decision-making process should yield more \\ntransparency.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"307-325\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open journal of philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPP.2021.112021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open journal of philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJPP.2021.112021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

全球范围内的新冠肺炎大流行更多地揭示了结合与生死问题、人类痛苦、生活质量、经济损失、行动自由等相关的科学知识和价值观做出医疗保健决策的困难,许多国家设立了有权评估医疗保健新技术的机构。卫生技术评估(HTA)报告旨在指导决策者解决这些难题。HTA有两个伦理组成部分。第一个是报告对该技术的伦理评估。二是HTA决策过程本身的价值取向。当没有得出隐含的价值判断时,最终决定的理由就不可能是透明的。本文旨在识别和引出与HTA过程中每个步骤相关的隐含价值判断。本研究基于价值判断在决策过程中的作用,建立在应用伦理决策范式的基础上。第一部分讨论了HTA中两种不同的价值观和价值判断方法。在第二部分中,对从一篇关于将伦理纳入HTA的系统综述中提取的提及价值判断的引文进行了分类,以得出每个不同HTA决策步骤的价值判断及其标准。结果表明,在HTA过程中有18个决策步骤,其中23个隐含价值判断可以被识别。这些价值判断的范围涵盖了整个HTA过程:从最初的请求、主要问题的提出到最终报告的传播。由于利益相关者需要了解报告结论所依赖的价值判断,因此在HTA决策过程中得出隐含的价值判断应该会产生更大的透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eliciting Value-Judgments in Health Technology Assessment: An Applied Ethics Decision Making Paradigm
The worldwide COVID-19 pandemic has shed more light on the difficulty of making health care decisions integrating scientific knowledge and values associated to life and death issues, human suffering, quality of life, economic losses, liberty of movement, etc. But the difficulties related to health care decisions and the use of innovative drugs or technologies are not new, and many countries have created agencies that have the mandate to evaluate new technologies in health care. Health Technological Assessment (HTA) reports’ aim is to guide the decision makers in these difficult matters. There are two ethical components in HTA. The first is the report’s presentation of an ethical evaluation of the technology. The second is the value-ladenness of the HTA decision-making process itself. When implicit value judgments are not elicited, the justification of the final decision cannot be transparent. The present paper aims to identify and elicit the implicit value-judgments related to each step of the HTA process. This research is grounded on an applied ethics decision-making paradigm based on the role of value judgments in the decision-making process. The first part discusses two different approaches to values and value judgments in HTA. In the second part, citations mentioning value judgments extracted from a systematic review on the integration of ethics into HTA were categorized to elicit the value judgments and their criteria for each different HTA decision-making steps. The results show that there are 18 decision-making steps in the HTA process where 23 implicit value-judgments can be recognized. The range of these value judgments encompasses the whole HTA process: from the initial request, the presenting of the principal issues, to the final report’s dissemination. Since stakeholders need to understand which value judgments the conclusion of a report relies on, eliciting the implicit value judgments in the HTA decision-making process should yield more transparency.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信