采样过程对测量不确定度的影响,以柴油理化参数为例

IF 0.8 4区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Viviane de Jesus Leite, Elcio Cruz de Oliveira, Ricardo Queiroz Aucélio
{"title":"采样过程对测量不确定度的影响,以柴油理化参数为例","authors":"Viviane de Jesus Leite,&nbsp;Elcio Cruz de Oliveira,&nbsp;Ricardo Queiroz Aucélio","doi":"10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The result of a chemical measurement is consequence of a set of steps that begins with sample selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of the sampling in overall measurement uncertainty, taking as study case physicochemical measurements of diesel. The empirical method used was by duplicates, and the treatment of data sets was performed by four different statistical techniques: classic analysis of variance, robust analysis of variance and two different Range Statistics models. The choice must be backed by previous evaluation of data set in terms of normality, independence, presence of outliers and homogeneity of variance. It was found that Range Statistics produced most reliable results under different premises and for the variety of physicochemical parameters evaluated. Robust analysis of variance failed indicates proper influence of sampling even it is a test designed to work under the lack of some of the proper premises.</p>","PeriodicalId":454,"journal":{"name":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","volume":"26 1","pages":"1 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of the sampling process on the measurement uncertainty, a case study: physicochemical parameters in diesel\",\"authors\":\"Viviane de Jesus Leite,&nbsp;Elcio Cruz de Oliveira,&nbsp;Ricardo Queiroz Aucélio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The result of a chemical measurement is consequence of a set of steps that begins with sample selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of the sampling in overall measurement uncertainty, taking as study case physicochemical measurements of diesel. The empirical method used was by duplicates, and the treatment of data sets was performed by four different statistical techniques: classic analysis of variance, robust analysis of variance and two different Range Statistics models. The choice must be backed by previous evaluation of data set in terms of normality, independence, presence of outliers and homogeneity of variance. It was found that Range Statistics produced most reliable results under different premises and for the variety of physicochemical parameters evaluated. Robust analysis of variance failed indicates proper influence of sampling even it is a test designed to work under the lack of some of the proper premises.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accreditation and Quality Assurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accreditation and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00769-020-01452-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

化学测量的结果是从样品选择开始的一系列步骤的结果。本研究的目的是评估抽样在整体测量不确定度中的相对重要性,并以柴油的物理化学测量为研究案例。使用的实证方法是重复,数据集的处理采用四种不同的统计技术:经典方差分析、稳健方差分析和两种不同的范围统计模型。选择必须以先前对数据集的正态性、独立性、异常值的存在和方差的同质性的评估为依据。结果表明,在不同的前提条件下,对于不同的理化参数,Range Statistics产生的结果是最可靠的。方差的稳健分析失败表明抽样的适当影响,即使它是一个设计在缺乏一些适当的前提下工作的测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Impact of the sampling process on the measurement uncertainty, a case study: physicochemical parameters in diesel

Impact of the sampling process on the measurement uncertainty, a case study: physicochemical parameters in diesel

The result of a chemical measurement is consequence of a set of steps that begins with sample selection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative importance of the sampling in overall measurement uncertainty, taking as study case physicochemical measurements of diesel. The empirical method used was by duplicates, and the treatment of data sets was performed by four different statistical techniques: classic analysis of variance, robust analysis of variance and two different Range Statistics models. The choice must be backed by previous evaluation of data set in terms of normality, independence, presence of outliers and homogeneity of variance. It was found that Range Statistics produced most reliable results under different premises and for the variety of physicochemical parameters evaluated. Robust analysis of variance failed indicates proper influence of sampling even it is a test designed to work under the lack of some of the proper premises.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accreditation and Quality Assurance
Accreditation and Quality Assurance 工程技术-分析化学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
22.20%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Accreditation and Quality Assurance has established itself as the leading information and discussion forum for all aspects relevant to quality, transparency and reliability of measurement results in chemical and biological sciences. The journal serves the information needs of researchers, practitioners and decision makers dealing with quality assurance and quality management, including the development and application of metrological principles and concepts such as traceability or measurement uncertainty in the following fields: environment, nutrition, consumer protection, geology, metallurgy, pharmacy, forensics, clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine, and microbiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信