护理学生对临床模拟成人免疫教育实践的看法

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Raphael Raniere de Oliveira Costa, S. Medeiros, V. Coutinho, R. S. D. Almeida, Marília Souto de Araújo
{"title":"护理学生对临床模拟成人免疫教育实践的看法","authors":"Raphael Raniere de Oliveira Costa, S. Medeiros, V. Coutinho, R. S. D. Almeida, Marília Souto de Araújo","doi":"10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.34267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS: To identify and compare the perceptions of students about educational practices in the teaching of immunization of adults.METHODS: Observational, descriptive, comparative, performed with nursing students. These students were allocated to two groups: traditional strategies group (dialogue and clinical simulation for skills training) and group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. After receiving the interventions, the Portuguese version of the Educational Practices Questionnaire was applied.RESULTS: The group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. presented higher means in seven of the eight domains of concordance and importance subscales, with statistical significance in the subscale of importance in the “different ways of learning” domain (p=0.018).CONCLUSION: The high-fidelity clinical simulation strategy scores the requirements of good educational practice in that it provides active, collaborative learning, different from traditional strategies, and provides positive expectations for students.","PeriodicalId":44024,"journal":{"name":"Scientia Medica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Percepções de estudantes de enfermagem sobre práticas educativas em imunização de adultos com o uso de Simulação Clínica\",\"authors\":\"Raphael Raniere de Oliveira Costa, S. Medeiros, V. Coutinho, R. S. D. Almeida, Marília Souto de Araújo\",\"doi\":\"10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.34267\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AIMS: To identify and compare the perceptions of students about educational practices in the teaching of immunization of adults.METHODS: Observational, descriptive, comparative, performed with nursing students. These students were allocated to two groups: traditional strategies group (dialogue and clinical simulation for skills training) and group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. After receiving the interventions, the Portuguese version of the Educational Practices Questionnaire was applied.RESULTS: The group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. presented higher means in seven of the eight domains of concordance and importance subscales, with statistical significance in the subscale of importance in the “different ways of learning” domain (p=0.018).CONCLUSION: The high-fidelity clinical simulation strategy scores the requirements of good educational practice in that it provides active, collaborative learning, different from traditional strategies, and provides positive expectations for students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientia Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.34267\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientia Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15448/1980-6108.2019.3.34267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:确定和比较学生对成人免疫教学中教育实践的看法。方法:采用观察性、描述性、比较性方法,与护生进行对照研究。这些学生被分为两组:传统策略组(用于技能培训的对话和临床模拟)和高保真临床模拟相关组。在收到干预措施后,采用了葡萄牙语版的教育实践问卷。结果:该组患者进行了高保真度临床模拟。在八个一致性和重要性分量表领域中的七个领域中呈现出较高的平均值,在“不同学习方式”领域的重要性分量表中具有统计学意义(p=0.018),不同于传统的策略,为学生提供了积极的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Percepções de estudantes de enfermagem sobre práticas educativas em imunização de adultos com o uso de Simulação Clínica
AIMS: To identify and compare the perceptions of students about educational practices in the teaching of immunization of adults.METHODS: Observational, descriptive, comparative, performed with nursing students. These students were allocated to two groups: traditional strategies group (dialogue and clinical simulation for skills training) and group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. After receiving the interventions, the Portuguese version of the Educational Practices Questionnaire was applied.RESULTS: The group associated with high fidelity clinical simulation. presented higher means in seven of the eight domains of concordance and importance subscales, with statistical significance in the subscale of importance in the “different ways of learning” domain (p=0.018).CONCLUSION: The high-fidelity clinical simulation strategy scores the requirements of good educational practice in that it provides active, collaborative learning, different from traditional strategies, and provides positive expectations for students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientia Medica
Scientia Medica MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信