三种语法和符号

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
C. Denroche
{"title":"三种语法和符号","authors":"C. Denroche","doi":"10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established\n triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden\n and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs\n in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way\n the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is\n further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language\n and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of\n the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s\n conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the\n development of improved research tools.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Three Grammars and the sign\",\"authors\":\"C. Denroche\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established\\n triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden\\n and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs\\n in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way\\n the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is\\n further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language\\n and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of\\n the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s\\n conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the\\n development of improved research tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/RCL.00081.DEN","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一个原始的语言符号三元模型,它与皮尔斯(1955年[1897])和奥格登和理查兹(1923年/1949年)建立的三元模型在识别思想、单词和事物为基本成分方面是一致的;但不同之处在于线性,思想和事物处于相反的两极。有人认为,这种排列反映了符号的组成部分与现实的联系方式,因此可以作为语言学研究的解释工具。该模型在每个本体论领域都使用认知语言学的概念进行了进一步的修改,重新命名为认知、语言和现实。新模型被用作两个案例研究的研究工具:一个是说明它在理解语言语法的复杂领域中的应用;另一种对比喻语言也是如此&隐喻和转喻。这篇文章的结论包括,在新理论的指导下,质疑语言学理论的既定基石可以导致改进的研究工具的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Three Grammars and the sign
This article presents an original three-component model of the linguistic sign. It shares with the established triadic models of Peirce (1955 [1897]) and Ogden and Richards (1923/1949) in identifying thought, word and thing as essential components; but differs in being linear, with thought and thing at opposite poles. It is argued that this arrangement reflects the way the components of the sign relate to reality and thereby serves well as an explanatory tool for linguistic research. The model is further modified at each of the ontological realms using concepts from cognitive linguistics, renamed cognition, language and reality. The new model is employed as a research tool in two case studies: one illustrates its use in making sense of the complex field of language grammar; the other does the same for figurative language – metaphor and metonymy. The article’s conclusions include that interrogating established cornerstones of linguistic theory in the light of new theory can lead to the development of improved research tools.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信