{"title":"合法性与模糊性:智障人士的制度逻辑及其结果","authors":"Jens Ineland","doi":"10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Organisations providing services for people with intellectual disabilities operate within a context of legal, moral, and institutional frameworks. This article uses an institutional framework to an ...","PeriodicalId":43838,"journal":{"name":"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Jens Ineland\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Organisations providing services for people with intellectual disabilities operate within a context of legal, moral, and institutional frameworks. This article uses an institutional framework to an ...\",\"PeriodicalId\":43838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities
Organisations providing services for people with intellectual disabilities operate within a context of legal, moral, and institutional frameworks. This article uses an institutional framework to an ...