晚期新古典经济学及其否定模式:对Chakrabarti、Glynos和Primrose的回应

IF 0.8 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Yahya M. Madra
{"title":"晚期新古典经济学及其否定模式:对Chakrabarti、Glynos和Primrose的回应","authors":"Yahya M. Madra","doi":"10.1080/08935696.2021.1972672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the fact that psychoanalytical concepts are absent in Yahya M. Madra’s Late Neoclassical Economics, the three commentaries on the book, by Chakrabarti, Glynos, and Primrose, read the text in a certain psychoanalytical key, and for good reason. Their readings demonstrate that a number of unnamed psychoanalytical models silently informed the discourse analysis mobilized throughout the text. Reading late neoclassical economics as an internally differentiated field of defense formations against contradictions, antagonisms, and conflicts that arise from the constitutive destructuredness of the economy, this response essay by Yahya M. Madra explores the applicability of the key psychoanalytical concepts of negation (repression, foreclosure, disavowal) for a discourse analysis of economic models.","PeriodicalId":45610,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","volume":"33 1","pages":"595 - 610"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Late Neoclassical Economics and Its Modes of Negation: A Response to Chakrabarti, Glynos, and Primrose\",\"authors\":\"Yahya M. Madra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08935696.2021.1972672\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the fact that psychoanalytical concepts are absent in Yahya M. Madra’s Late Neoclassical Economics, the three commentaries on the book, by Chakrabarti, Glynos, and Primrose, read the text in a certain psychoanalytical key, and for good reason. Their readings demonstrate that a number of unnamed psychoanalytical models silently informed the discourse analysis mobilized throughout the text. Reading late neoclassical economics as an internally differentiated field of defense formations against contradictions, antagonisms, and conflicts that arise from the constitutive destructuredness of the economy, this response essay by Yahya M. Madra explores the applicability of the key psychoanalytical concepts of negation (repression, foreclosure, disavowal) for a discourse analysis of economic models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"595 - 610\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1972672\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Marxism-A Journal of Economics Culture & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2021.1972672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管Yahya M. Madra的《晚期新古典经济学》中缺少精神分析的概念,但Chakrabarti、Glynos和Primrose对这本书的三篇评论,以某种精神分析的方式阅读了这本书,这是有充分理由的。他们的阅读表明,许多未命名的精神分析模型无声地通知了整个文本动员的话语分析。叶海亚·m·马德拉(Yahya M. Madra)的这篇回应文章将晚期新古典经济学视为一个内部分化的领域,该领域针对经济的结构性解构所产生的矛盾、对抗和冲突进行防御,探讨了精神分析中关键的否定概念(压抑、丧失抵押品赎回权、否认)在经济模型话语分析中的适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Late Neoclassical Economics and Its Modes of Negation: A Response to Chakrabarti, Glynos, and Primrose
Despite the fact that psychoanalytical concepts are absent in Yahya M. Madra’s Late Neoclassical Economics, the three commentaries on the book, by Chakrabarti, Glynos, and Primrose, read the text in a certain psychoanalytical key, and for good reason. Their readings demonstrate that a number of unnamed psychoanalytical models silently informed the discourse analysis mobilized throughout the text. Reading late neoclassical economics as an internally differentiated field of defense formations against contradictions, antagonisms, and conflicts that arise from the constitutive destructuredness of the economy, this response essay by Yahya M. Madra explores the applicability of the key psychoanalytical concepts of negation (repression, foreclosure, disavowal) for a discourse analysis of economic models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
30
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信