子宫内膜液生物标志物及其作为成功胚胎植入预测指标的潜力

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
BioMedicine-Taiwan Pub Date : 2023-09-01 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.37796/2211-8039.1413
Ana R Alves, Margarida F Dias, Margarida Silvestre
{"title":"子宫内膜液生物标志物及其作为成功胚胎植入预测指标的潜力","authors":"Ana R Alves, Margarida F Dias, Margarida Silvestre","doi":"10.37796/2211-8039.1413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and 'embryo implantation' was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627212/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Endometrial fluid biomarkers and their potential as predictors of successful embryo implantation.\",\"authors\":\"Ana R Alves, Margarida F Dias, Margarida Silvestre\",\"doi\":\"10.37796/2211-8039.1413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and 'embryo implantation' was used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51650,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10627212/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BioMedicine-Taiwan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1413\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37796/2211-8039.1413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:胚胎植入是一个复杂的生物学过程,需要接受性子宫内膜和胚泡之间的同步对话。然而,子宫内膜只在很短的时间内接受胚胎植入。复发性植入失败(RIF)是辅助生殖技术中的一个主要挑战,主要是由于接受能力受损,但仍需要一种可靠有效的临床测试来评估子宫内膜接受能力,尤其是在胚胎移植时。这篇综述的目的是通过识别其潜在的生物标志物,研究目前已知的子宫内膜液体(EF)对子宫内膜容受性的贡献。方法:本研究涉及对PubMed和Cochrane电子数据库的广泛搜索,时间跨度为2011年至2022年。使用了医学主题标题与术语“子宫内膜液体”和“胚胎植入”的组合。结果:子宫内膜腔液中存在的几种不同蛋白质已被描述,但最一致的潜在生物标志物是前蛋白转化酶6(PC6)、血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、PIGF(胎盘生长因子)、b3整合素、集落刺激因子-3(CSF-3)、白血病抑制因子(LIF)、糖蛋白和细胞外小泡(EVs)。结论:强有力的指标支持将子宫液体收集作为一种非侵入性的接受性评估工具。因此,它可以改善辅助生殖技术的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Endometrial fluid biomarkers and their potential as predictors of successful embryo implantation.

Background: Embryo implantation is a complex biological process which requires synchronized dialogue between the receptive endometrium and the blastocyst. The endometrium, however, is only receptive to embryo implantation for a very short period. Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is a major challenge in assisted reproductive techniques mainly due to impaired receptivity, but there is still a need for a reliable and valid clinical test to assess endometrial receptiveness, especially at embryo transfer time. The aim of this review is to investigate what is currently known about the contribution of endometrial fluid (EF) to endometrial receptivity by identifying its potential biomarkers.

Methods: This study involved an extensive search of the electronic databases PubMed and Cochrane, covering the period from 2011 to 2022. A combination of Medical Subject Headings with the terms 'endometrial fluid' and 'embryo implantation' was used.

Results: Several different proteins presented in the endometrial cavity fluid have been described but the most consistent as potential biomarkers were Proprotein Convertase 6 (PC6), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF), PIGF (Placental growth factor), β3 integrin, Colony Stimulating Factor-3 (CSF-3), Leukaemia inhibitory factor (LIF), glycodelin and extracellular vesicles (EVs).

Conclusions: Strong indicators support the use of uterine fluid collection as a non-invasive tool for receptivity assessment. Therefore, it could improve outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedicine-Taiwan
BioMedicine-Taiwan MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信