储存库丁丙诺啡注射液治疗阿片类药物使用障碍:从开发到实施

IF 5.1 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
W. Ling, S. Shoptaw, D. Goodman-Meza
{"title":"储存库丁丙诺啡注射液治疗阿片类药物使用障碍:从开发到实施","authors":"W. Ling, S. Shoptaw, D. Goodman-Meza","doi":"10.2147/SAR.S155843","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Buprenorphine has pharmacologic advantages over methadone, especially buprenorphine’s better safety profile. The true significance of buprenorphine’s introduction lies in returning the care of those suffering from opioid use disorder (OUD) to the hands of the physician. The clinical success of buprenorphine has been meager, in part because most physicians have not been exposed to treating these patients. For physicians inclined to treat OUD, the barriers to buprenorphine’s implementation have been onerous and largely counter to the norms of medical practice. Some notable concerns pertain to buprenorphine’s clinical pharmacology like street diversion, unintended use and accidental poisoning. Recently, injectable buprenorphine preparations have been introduced to mitigate these latter shortcomings. Yet, the injectable preparations’ clinical and commercial success has fallen far short of expectation. Here, we review the clinical pharmacology of these products and their expected clinical advantages for the manufacturers, clinicians, policy makers and patients, and offer our perspective, as clinicians and researchers, on how things can improve. Questions remain whether clinicians are willing to overcome barriers to treat OUD using these medications.","PeriodicalId":22060,"journal":{"name":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","volume":"10 1","pages":"69 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SAR.S155843","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Depot Buprenorphine Injection In The Management Of Opioid Use Disorder: From Development To Implementation\",\"authors\":\"W. Ling, S. Shoptaw, D. Goodman-Meza\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/SAR.S155843\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Buprenorphine has pharmacologic advantages over methadone, especially buprenorphine’s better safety profile. The true significance of buprenorphine’s introduction lies in returning the care of those suffering from opioid use disorder (OUD) to the hands of the physician. The clinical success of buprenorphine has been meager, in part because most physicians have not been exposed to treating these patients. For physicians inclined to treat OUD, the barriers to buprenorphine’s implementation have been onerous and largely counter to the norms of medical practice. Some notable concerns pertain to buprenorphine’s clinical pharmacology like street diversion, unintended use and accidental poisoning. Recently, injectable buprenorphine preparations have been introduced to mitigate these latter shortcomings. Yet, the injectable preparations’ clinical and commercial success has fallen far short of expectation. Here, we review the clinical pharmacology of these products and their expected clinical advantages for the manufacturers, clinicians, policy makers and patients, and offer our perspective, as clinicians and researchers, on how things can improve. Questions remain whether clinicians are willing to overcome barriers to treat OUD using these medications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/SAR.S155843\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S155843\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Abuse and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S155843","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

摘要丁丙诺啡在药理学上优于美沙酮,尤其是丁丙诺芬具有更好的安全性。丁丙诺啡引入的真正意义在于将阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)患者的护理交还给医生。丁丙诺啡的临床成功率很低,部分原因是大多数医生没有接触过治疗这些患者。对于倾向于治疗OUD的医生来说,丁丙诺啡的实施障碍重重,在很大程度上违反了医疗实践规范。一些值得注意的问题与丁丙诺啡的临床药理学有关,如街道改道、意外使用和意外中毒。最近,丁丙诺啡注射液已被引入以减轻后一种缺点。然而,注射制剂的临床和商业成功远远达不到预期。在这里,我们回顾了这些产品的临床药理学及其对制造商、临床医生、政策制定者和患者的预期临床优势,并作为临床医生和研究人员,就如何改进提供了我们的观点。临床医生是否愿意克服使用这些药物治疗OUD的障碍仍然是个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Depot Buprenorphine Injection In The Management Of Opioid Use Disorder: From Development To Implementation
Abstract Buprenorphine has pharmacologic advantages over methadone, especially buprenorphine’s better safety profile. The true significance of buprenorphine’s introduction lies in returning the care of those suffering from opioid use disorder (OUD) to the hands of the physician. The clinical success of buprenorphine has been meager, in part because most physicians have not been exposed to treating these patients. For physicians inclined to treat OUD, the barriers to buprenorphine’s implementation have been onerous and largely counter to the norms of medical practice. Some notable concerns pertain to buprenorphine’s clinical pharmacology like street diversion, unintended use and accidental poisoning. Recently, injectable buprenorphine preparations have been introduced to mitigate these latter shortcomings. Yet, the injectable preparations’ clinical and commercial success has fallen far short of expectation. Here, we review the clinical pharmacology of these products and their expected clinical advantages for the manufacturers, clinicians, policy makers and patients, and offer our perspective, as clinicians and researchers, on how things can improve. Questions remain whether clinicians are willing to overcome barriers to treat OUD using these medications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信