珍妮弗·伊格尔顿,《香港话语变化:社会政治动态、隐喻与一国两制》。纽约:列克星敦出版社,2022年。第404页。Hb$120

IF 2 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Eugene Yu Ji
{"title":"珍妮弗·伊格尔顿,《香港话语变化:社会政治动态、隐喻与一国两制》。纽约:列克星敦出版社,2022年。第404页。Hb$120","authors":"Eugene Yu Ji","doi":"10.1017/s0047404523000222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"tals to Trump and support for a smart border, Clinton used the language of emotion to invoke notions of the US as a compassionate, welcoming nation of immigrants. This merging of affect and historical discourses with the neoliberal language of technical efficiency, Demata argues, formed part of Democrats’ larger political strategy of recontextualising family values discourse, long a pillar of conservative rhetoric, as progressive immigration policy. As populist and neoliberal discourses contend to define a post-global world, Demata reminds us how borders—including the plights of those attempting to cross them—can serve as symbols of social order as well as proxies for political struggle. Although brief, his study offers important insights into how the recontextualisation of political discourses, namely, of family values, the aesthetics of exclusion, and the neoliberal ethics of modernity, contribute to ideological discursive formation and contemporary political language.","PeriodicalId":51442,"journal":{"name":"Language in Society","volume":"52 1","pages":"538 - 539"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Jennifer Eagleton, Discursive change in Hong Kong: Sociopolitical dynamics, metaphor, and one country, two systems. New York: Lexington Books, 2022. Pp. 404. Hb. $120.\",\"authors\":\"Eugene Yu Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0047404523000222\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"tals to Trump and support for a smart border, Clinton used the language of emotion to invoke notions of the US as a compassionate, welcoming nation of immigrants. This merging of affect and historical discourses with the neoliberal language of technical efficiency, Demata argues, formed part of Democrats’ larger political strategy of recontextualising family values discourse, long a pillar of conservative rhetoric, as progressive immigration policy. As populist and neoliberal discourses contend to define a post-global world, Demata reminds us how borders—including the plights of those attempting to cross them—can serve as symbols of social order as well as proxies for political struggle. Although brief, his study offers important insights into how the recontextualisation of political discourses, namely, of family values, the aesthetics of exclusion, and the neoliberal ethics of modernity, contribute to ideological discursive formation and contemporary political language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language in Society\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"538 - 539\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language in Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404523000222\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language in Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047404523000222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

克林顿用情感的语言唤起了美国作为一个富有同情心、热情好客的移民国家的观念。德玛塔认为,这种情感和历史话语与技术效率的新自由主义语言的融合,构成了民主党将家庭价值观话语重新文本化的更大政治战略的一部分,长期以来,家庭价值观一直是保守派言论的支柱,是进步移民政策。当民粹主义和新自由主义话语试图定义一个后全球世界时,德马塔提醒我们,边界——包括那些试图跨越边界的人的困境——可以成为社会秩序的象征,也可以成为政治斗争的代理人。他的研究虽然简短,但对政治话语的重新文本化,即家庭价值观、排斥美学和现代性的新自由主义伦理,如何有助于意识形态话语的形成和当代政治语言,提供了重要的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Jennifer Eagleton, Discursive change in Hong Kong: Sociopolitical dynamics, metaphor, and one country, two systems. New York: Lexington Books, 2022. Pp. 404. Hb. $120.
tals to Trump and support for a smart border, Clinton used the language of emotion to invoke notions of the US as a compassionate, welcoming nation of immigrants. This merging of affect and historical discourses with the neoliberal language of technical efficiency, Demata argues, formed part of Democrats’ larger political strategy of recontextualising family values discourse, long a pillar of conservative rhetoric, as progressive immigration policy. As populist and neoliberal discourses contend to define a post-global world, Demata reminds us how borders—including the plights of those attempting to cross them—can serve as symbols of social order as well as proxies for political struggle. Although brief, his study offers important insights into how the recontextualisation of political discourses, namely, of family values, the aesthetics of exclusion, and the neoliberal ethics of modernity, contribute to ideological discursive formation and contemporary political language.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: Language in Society is an international journal of sociolinguistics concerned with language and discourse as aspects of social life. The journal publishes empirical articles of general theoretical, comparative or methodological interest to students and scholars in sociolinguistics, linguistic anthropology, and related fields. Language in Society aims to strengthen international scholarship and interdisciplinary conversation and cooperation among researchers interested in language and society by publishing work of high quality which speaks to a wide audience. In addition to original articles, the journal publishes reviews and notices of the latest important books in the field as well as occasional theme and discussion sections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信