“不受你们行善者宣传的影响”

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION

Central European Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).3

Jana Rosenfeldová, Lenka Vochocová

{"title":"“不受你们行善者宣传的影响”","authors":"Jana Rosenfeldová, Lenka Vochocová","doi":"10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe role of the media in polarizing the debate on immigration has been subject to a growing amount of research; yet little is known about whether and how online comment sections related to news articles on immigration reshape the journalistic narrative. This study examines readers’ reactions to the media coverage by employing a quantitative content analysis of over 6,000 users’ comments responding to 128 online news articles on immigration. It concludes that generally the discussants’ perspective does not differ significantly from the medium’s framing of the issue with one important exception: the human rights frame accentuated by the medium is strictly refused by the discussants. The discussants also bring the economic and cultural aspects of immigration into the debate. The article thus contributes to a more general understanding of the role the users’ discussions play in shaping the debates on controversial political issues.\n","PeriodicalId":40610,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Untouched by your Do-gooder Propaganda”\",\"authors\":\"Jana Rosenfeldová, Lenka Vochocová\",\"doi\":\"10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThe role of the media in polarizing the debate on immigration has been subject to a growing amount of research; yet little is known about whether and how online comment sections related to news articles on immigration reshape the journalistic narrative. This study examines readers’ reactions to the media coverage by employing a quantitative content analysis of over 6,000 users’ comments responding to 128 online news articles on immigration. It concludes that generally the discussants’ perspective does not differ significantly from the medium’s framing of the issue with one important exception: the human rights frame accentuated by the medium is strictly refused by the discussants. The discussants also bring the economic and cultural aspects of immigration into the debate. The article thus contributes to a more general understanding of the role the users’ discussions play in shaping the debates on controversial political issues.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":40610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.15.2(31).3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的研究表明，媒体在移民辩论中的作用两极分化；然而，人们对与移民新闻文章相关的在线评论部分是否以及如何重塑新闻叙事知之甚少。这项研究通过对6000多名用户对128篇关于移民的在线新闻文章的评论进行定量内容分析，考察了读者对媒体报道的反应。它的结论是，一般来说，讨论者的观点与媒体对这个问题的框架没有太大区别，只有一个重要的例外：媒体强调的人权框架被讨论者严格拒绝。讨论者还将移民的经济和文化方面纳入辩论。因此，这篇文章有助于更全面地理解用户的讨论在形成关于有争议的政治问题的辩论中所起的作用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Untouched by your Do-gooder Propaganda”

The role of the media in polarizing the debate on immigration has been subject to a growing amount of research; yet little is known about whether and how online comment sections related to news articles on immigration reshape the journalistic narrative. This study examines readers’ reactions to the media coverage by employing a quantitative content analysis of over 6,000 users’ comments responding to 128 online news articles on immigration. It concludes that generally the discussants’ perspective does not differ significantly from the medium’s framing of the issue with one important exception: the human rights frame accentuated by the medium is strictly refused by the discussants. The discussants also bring the economic and cultural aspects of immigration into the debate. The article thus contributes to a more general understanding of the role the users’ discussions play in shaping the debates on controversial political issues.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Central European Journal of Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Central European Journal of Communication provides an international forum for empirical, critical and interpretative, quantitative and qualitative research examining the role of communication in Central Europe and beyond. The journal welcomes high quality research and analysis from diverse theoretical and methodological approaches, as well as reviews of publications and publishes notes on a wide range of literature on media and communication studies. Submission of original articles is open to all researchers interested in communication and media.