违反国际人道主义法,法律责任,以及美国对也门沙特联军的军事支持:一个警世故事

Q3 Social Sciences
J. Hursh
{"title":"违反国际人道主义法,法律责任,以及美国对也门沙特联军的军事支持:一个警世故事","authors":"J. Hursh","doi":"10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article considers international humanitarian law violations and legal responsibility in relation to US military support provided to the Saudi Arabia-led coalition fighting a non-international armed conflict in Yemen. Through this example, this article examines the broader issue of states not party to an armed conflict providing military assistance to states that are party to a conflict in a manner that may blur legal responsibility and undermine accountability. To do so, it considers this military assistance in relation to the use of force, state responsibility, and international humanitarian law. First describing the US military assistance provided to the Saudi coalition, the article then assesses the lawfulness of the coalition’s use of force, whether the United States became a party to conflict, if the United States violated the law of state responsibility, and finally whether the United States adhered to its Common Article 1 duty to respect and to ensure respect.","PeriodicalId":37206,"journal":{"name":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","volume":"7 1","pages":"122 - 155"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International humanitarian law violations, legal responsibility, and US military support to the Saudi coalition in Yemen: a cautionary tale\",\"authors\":\"J. Hursh\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article considers international humanitarian law violations and legal responsibility in relation to US military support provided to the Saudi Arabia-led coalition fighting a non-international armed conflict in Yemen. Through this example, this article examines the broader issue of states not party to an armed conflict providing military assistance to states that are party to a conflict in a manner that may blur legal responsibility and undermine accountability. To do so, it considers this military assistance in relation to the use of force, state responsibility, and international humanitarian law. First describing the US military assistance provided to the Saudi coalition, the article then assesses the lawfulness of the coalition’s use of force, whether the United States became a party to conflict, if the United States violated the law of state responsibility, and finally whether the United States adhered to its Common Article 1 duty to respect and to ensure respect.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"122 - 155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on the Use of Force and International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20531702.2020.1782664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了美国向沙特领导的也门非国际武装冲突联盟提供军事支持的违反国际人道主义法行为和法律责任。通过这个例子,本文探讨了一个更广泛的问题,即非武装冲突当事国以可能模糊法律责任和破坏问责制的方式向冲突当事方提供军事援助。为此,它认为这种军事援助与使用武力、国家责任和国际人道主义法有关。文章首先描述了美国向沙特联盟提供的军事援助,然后评估了联盟使用武力的合法性,美国是否成为冲突的一方,美国是否违反了国家责任法,最后评估了美国是否遵守了其共同的第一条义务,即尊重和确保尊重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International humanitarian law violations, legal responsibility, and US military support to the Saudi coalition in Yemen: a cautionary tale
ABSTRACT This article considers international humanitarian law violations and legal responsibility in relation to US military support provided to the Saudi Arabia-led coalition fighting a non-international armed conflict in Yemen. Through this example, this article examines the broader issue of states not party to an armed conflict providing military assistance to states that are party to a conflict in a manner that may blur legal responsibility and undermine accountability. To do so, it considers this military assistance in relation to the use of force, state responsibility, and international humanitarian law. First describing the US military assistance provided to the Saudi coalition, the article then assesses the lawfulness of the coalition’s use of force, whether the United States became a party to conflict, if the United States violated the law of state responsibility, and finally whether the United States adhered to its Common Article 1 duty to respect and to ensure respect.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信