对俄国激进主义2.0批判的回应:辩证的兰德

Q1 Arts and Humanities

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Pub Date : 2017-12-02 DOI:10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0321

C. Sciabarra

{"title":"对俄国激进主义2.0批判的回应:辩证的兰德","authors":"C. Sciabarra","doi":"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (July 2015), and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand (2016). Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend \"dialectical libertarianism,\" which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode of inquiry. Sciabarra argues that dialectics—the art of context-keeping—figures prominently throughout Rand's literary and philosophical corpus.","PeriodicalId":35149,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","volume":"17 1","pages":"321 - 357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: The Dialectical Rand\",\"authors\":\"C. Sciabarra\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (July 2015), and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand (2016). Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend \\\"dialectical libertarianism,\\\" which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode of inquiry. Sciabarra argues that dialectics—the art of context-keeping—figures prominently throughout Rand's literary and philosophical corpus.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"321 - 357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0321\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JAYNRANDSTUD.17.2.0321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:夏巴拉对其著作《安·兰德:俄罗斯激进分子》第二版的批评做出了回应:温迪·麦克罗伊在《安·兰德研究杂志》(2015年7月)上评论了该书，肖莎娜·米尔格拉姆和格雷戈里·萨尔米耶里在《安·兰德伴侣》(2016年)上发表了最新的批评。Sciabarra为他的历史和方法论论点辩护，把这本书放在定义和捍卫“辩证自由意志主义”的三部曲中，它避开了乌托邦式的思考，拥抱了一种完全激进的探索模式。Sciabarra认为辩证法——保持语境的艺术——在Rand的文学和哲学语料库中占据突出地位。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Reply to the Critics of Russian Radical 2.0: The Dialectical Rand

ABSTRACT:Sciabarra responds to critics of the second edition of his book, Ayn Rand: The Russian Radical: Wendy McElroy, who reviewed the book for The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies (July 2015), and Shoshana Milgram and Gregory Salmieri, whose most recent criticisms appear in A Companion to Ayn Rand (2016). Sciabarra defends both his historical and methodological theses, situating the book within a trilogy of works that define and defend "dialectical libertarianism," which eschews utopian thinking and embraces a fully radical mode of inquiry. Sciabarra argues that dialectics—the art of context-keeping—figures prominently throughout Rand's literary and philosophical corpus.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies Foundation has entered into an electronic licensing relationship with EBSCO Publishing, the world"s most prolific aggregator of full-text journals, magazines, and other sources. The full text of The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies can be found on EBSCO Publishing"s databases. A nonpartisan journal devoted to the study of Ayn Rand and her times. The journal is not aligned with any advocacy group, institute, or person. It welcomes papers from every discipline and from a variety of interpretive and critical perspectives. It aims to foster scholarly dialogue through a respectful exchange of ideas. The journal is published semi-annually, in the fall and the spring.