理论和实践中对性别问题敏感的立法后审查

IF 1.5 Q1 LAW
Maria Mousmouti
{"title":"理论和实践中对性别问题敏感的立法后审查","authors":"Maria Mousmouti","doi":"10.1080/20508840.2022.2154455","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) enables an assessment of whether laws have met their intended objectives and outcomes. PLS can reveal achievements and errors in the design of legislation, achievements and gaps in implementation and broader positive and negative impacts that enable or hinder the achievement of regulatory results. Gender-sensitive post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) is PLS with a gender lens. Gender sensitive PLS is a strategic tool that can detect the impact of the law on gender equality. It can reveal the actual impact of legislation on men, women and gender inequalities, make visible biases, stereotypes and assumptions relating to gender and other characteristics, access, participation barriers and data gaps and improve the effectiveness of legislative initiatives. As a process, gender sensitive PLS requires a clear gender focus in the scrutiny, a gender sensitive data collection process and conclusions and recommendations that clearly highlight, among other findings, achievements and failures in relation to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS is a powerful tool for gender sensitive Parliaments on the road to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS can trigger legislative and institutional change, encourage advocacy, raise awareness and create ripple effects within Parliaments and other bodies around gender equality issues.","PeriodicalId":42455,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-sensitive post-legislative scrutiny in theory and practice\",\"authors\":\"Maria Mousmouti\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20508840.2022.2154455\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) enables an assessment of whether laws have met their intended objectives and outcomes. PLS can reveal achievements and errors in the design of legislation, achievements and gaps in implementation and broader positive and negative impacts that enable or hinder the achievement of regulatory results. Gender-sensitive post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) is PLS with a gender lens. Gender sensitive PLS is a strategic tool that can detect the impact of the law on gender equality. It can reveal the actual impact of legislation on men, women and gender inequalities, make visible biases, stereotypes and assumptions relating to gender and other characteristics, access, participation barriers and data gaps and improve the effectiveness of legislative initiatives. As a process, gender sensitive PLS requires a clear gender focus in the scrutiny, a gender sensitive data collection process and conclusions and recommendations that clearly highlight, among other findings, achievements and failures in relation to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS is a powerful tool for gender sensitive Parliaments on the road to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS can trigger legislative and institutional change, encourage advocacy, raise awareness and create ripple effects within Parliaments and other bodies around gender equality issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Practice of Legislation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2154455\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Legislation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2022.2154455","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

立法后审查(PLS)能够评估法律是否达到了预期的目标和结果。PLS可以揭示立法设计中的成就和错误,实施中的成就和差距,以及促进或阻碍实现监管结果的更广泛的积极和消极影响。性别敏感的立法后审查(PLS)是带有性别视角的PLS。性别敏感PLS是一种战略工具,可以检测法律对性别平等的影响。它可以揭示立法对男子、妇女和性别不平等的实际影响,揭示与性别和其他特征、获取、参与障碍和数据差距有关的明显偏见、陈规定型观念和假设,并提高立法举措的有效性。作为一个过程,性别敏感的PLS需要在审查中明确的性别焦点,性别敏感的数据收集过程和结论和建议,除其他发现外,明确强调与性别平等有关的成就和失败。性别敏感的PLS是对性别敏感的议会在实现性别平等的道路上的有力工具。性别敏感的PLS可以引发立法和体制变革,鼓励宣传,提高认识,并在议会和其他机构内就性别平等问题产生连锁反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender-sensitive post-legislative scrutiny in theory and practice
ABSTRACT Post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) enables an assessment of whether laws have met their intended objectives and outcomes. PLS can reveal achievements and errors in the design of legislation, achievements and gaps in implementation and broader positive and negative impacts that enable or hinder the achievement of regulatory results. Gender-sensitive post-legislative scrutiny (PLS) is PLS with a gender lens. Gender sensitive PLS is a strategic tool that can detect the impact of the law on gender equality. It can reveal the actual impact of legislation on men, women and gender inequalities, make visible biases, stereotypes and assumptions relating to gender and other characteristics, access, participation barriers and data gaps and improve the effectiveness of legislative initiatives. As a process, gender sensitive PLS requires a clear gender focus in the scrutiny, a gender sensitive data collection process and conclusions and recommendations that clearly highlight, among other findings, achievements and failures in relation to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS is a powerful tool for gender sensitive Parliaments on the road to gender equality. Gender sensitive PLS can trigger legislative and institutional change, encourage advocacy, raise awareness and create ripple effects within Parliaments and other bodies around gender equality issues.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Theory and Practice of Legislation aims to offer an international and interdisciplinary forum for the examination of legislation. The focus of the journal, which succeeds the former title Legisprudence, remains with legislation in its broadest sense. Legislation is seen as both process and product, reflection of theoretical assumptions and a skill. The journal addresses formal legislation, and its alternatives (such as covenants, regulation by non-state actors etc.). The editors welcome articles on systematic (as opposed to historical) issues, including drafting techniques, the introduction of open standards, evidence-based drafting, pre- and post-legislative scrutiny for effectiveness and efficiency, the utility and necessity of codification, IT in legislation, the legitimacy of legislation in view of fundamental principles and rights, law and language, and the link between legislator and judge. Comparative and interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged. But dogmatic descriptions of positive law are outside the scope of the journal. The journal offers a combination of themed issues and general issues. All articles are submitted to double blind review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信