来自文章“Collatz猜想失败时的两种不同情况”的评论

P. Kosobutskyy
{"title":"来自文章“Collatz猜想失败时的两种不同情况”的评论","authors":"P. Kosobutskyy","doi":"10.31559/glm2022.12.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This work substantiates the essence of the erroneous conclusion of the author of the work ‘M. Ahmed, Two different scenarios when the Collatz Conjecture fails. General Letters in Mathematics. 2021‘ about the false of Collatz’s hypothesis. Keywords","PeriodicalId":32454,"journal":{"name":"General Letters in Mathematics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment from article ”Two different scenarios when the Collatz Conjecture fails”\",\"authors\":\"P. Kosobutskyy\",\"doi\":\"10.31559/glm2022.12.4.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This work substantiates the essence of the erroneous conclusion of the author of the work ‘M. Ahmed, Two different scenarios when the Collatz Conjecture fails. General Letters in Mathematics. 2021‘ about the false of Collatz’s hypothesis. Keywords\",\"PeriodicalId\":32454,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Letters in Mathematics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Letters in Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31559/glm2022.12.4.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Letters in Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31559/glm2022.12.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这部作品证实了作者M的错误结论的本质。Ahmed,当Collatz猜想失败时的两种不同场景。数学通函。关于Collatz假说的错误。关键词
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment from article ”Two different scenarios when the Collatz Conjecture fails”
This work substantiates the essence of the erroneous conclusion of the author of the work ‘M. Ahmed, Two different scenarios when the Collatz Conjecture fails. General Letters in Mathematics. 2021‘ about the false of Collatz’s hypothesis. Keywords
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信