通过倾向得分分析评估森林生态系统服务支付的有效性

IF 0.8 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Huynh Nguyen, Nguyen Hung
{"title":"通过倾向得分分析评估森林生态系统服务支付的有效性","authors":"Huynh Nguyen, Nguyen Hung","doi":"10.5937/ekopolj2001087n","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Vietnamese Government have been implementing the Payment for Forest Ecosystem Service (PFES) since2008 with the aim of both improving natural forest status and enhancing income for mountainous community. Yet, effectiveness of the PFES scheme is now debated because of the shortage of experimental studies. So, the overall purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the PFES program by propensity scores analysis. To do so, the study randomly surveyed 469 households located in four districts across Quang Nam province and then estimated the Average Treatment Effect on Treated (ATET). It is found that: (1) the households within PFES had got a insignificantly higher income than those without PES in the short-run; (2) yet, PFES was effective in long-run due to the improvement on income for participants; (3) PFES had an important role in increasing income inequality. Although this study demonstrated reasonable results, some limitations still exist due to the objective reasons, thus more studies with alternative methods should be conducted to confirm the results of this study for better policies.","PeriodicalId":45567,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","volume":"67 1","pages":"87-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating effectiveness of payments for forest ecosystem services by propensity scores analysis\",\"authors\":\"Huynh Nguyen, Nguyen Hung\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/ekopolj2001087n\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Vietnamese Government have been implementing the Payment for Forest Ecosystem Service (PFES) since2008 with the aim of both improving natural forest status and enhancing income for mountainous community. Yet, effectiveness of the PFES scheme is now debated because of the shortage of experimental studies. So, the overall purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the PFES program by propensity scores analysis. To do so, the study randomly surveyed 469 households located in four districts across Quang Nam province and then estimated the Average Treatment Effect on Treated (ATET). It is found that: (1) the households within PFES had got a insignificantly higher income than those without PES in the short-run; (2) yet, PFES was effective in long-run due to the improvement on income for participants; (3) PFES had an important role in increasing income inequality. Although this study demonstrated reasonable results, some limitations still exist due to the objective reasons, thus more studies with alternative methods should be conducted to confirm the results of this study for better policies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"87-106\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2001087n\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/ekopolj2001087n","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

自2008年以来,越南政府一直在实施森林生态系统服务付费,目的是改善天然林状况,增加山区社区的收入。然而,由于缺乏实验研究,PFES计划的有效性现在备受争议。因此,本研究的总体目的是通过倾向得分分析来衡量PFES计划的有效性。为此,该研究随机调查了广南省四个区的469户家庭,然后估计了平均治疗效果(ATET)。研究发现:(1)在短期内,PFES内的家庭收入略高于没有PES的家庭;(2) 然而,PFES从长期来看是有效的,因为参与者的收入有所提高;(3) PFES在加剧收入不平等方面发挥了重要作用。尽管这项研究证明了合理的结果,但由于客观原因,仍存在一些局限性,因此应采用更多替代方法进行研究,以确认这项研究的结果,从而制定更好的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating effectiveness of payments for forest ecosystem services by propensity scores analysis
The Vietnamese Government have been implementing the Payment for Forest Ecosystem Service (PFES) since2008 with the aim of both improving natural forest status and enhancing income for mountainous community. Yet, effectiveness of the PFES scheme is now debated because of the shortage of experimental studies. So, the overall purpose of this study is to measure the effectiveness of the PFES program by propensity scores analysis. To do so, the study randomly surveyed 469 households located in four districts across Quang Nam province and then estimated the Average Treatment Effect on Treated (ATET). It is found that: (1) the households within PFES had got a insignificantly higher income than those without PES in the short-run; (2) yet, PFES was effective in long-run due to the improvement on income for participants; (3) PFES had an important role in increasing income inequality. Although this study demonstrated reasonable results, some limitations still exist due to the objective reasons, thus more studies with alternative methods should be conducted to confirm the results of this study for better policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture
Ekonomika Poljoprivreda-Economics of Agriculture AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
50.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信