分配和重新分配

IF 0.5 0 PHILOSOPHY

Analisis Filosofico Pub Date : 2021-05-01 DOI:10.36446/AF.2021.355

F. Abal

{"title":"分配和重新分配","authors":"F. Abal","doi":"10.36446/AF.2021.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, several authors have analyzed what is the appropriate moral criterion to distribute scarce therapeutic resources. In doing so they assume that there is no relevant normative difference between the distribution of unallocated therapeutic resources and the distribution of therapeutic resources that have already been allocated. Consequently, they affirm that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions is the same. In the present work, I argue that there is a relevant normative difference between these decisions and that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions must be different. © 2021 Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Filosofico. All rights reserved.","PeriodicalId":40940,"journal":{"name":"Analisis Filosofico","volume":"41 1","pages":"37-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asignar y reasignar\",\"authors\":\"F. Abal\",\"doi\":\"10.36446/AF.2021.355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, several authors have analyzed what is the appropriate moral criterion to distribute scarce therapeutic resources. In doing so they assume that there is no relevant normative difference between the distribution of unallocated therapeutic resources and the distribution of therapeutic resources that have already been allocated. Consequently, they affirm that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions is the same. In the present work, I argue that there is a relevant normative difference between these decisions and that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions must be different. © 2021 Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Filosofico. All rights reserved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analisis Filosofico\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"37-65\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analisis Filosofico\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36446/AF.2021.355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analisis Filosofico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36446/AF.2021.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在新冠肺炎大流行的背景下，几位作者分析了分配稀缺治疗资源的适当道德标准。在这样做的过程中，他们假设未分配的治疗资源的分配和已经分配的治疗资金的分配之间没有相关的规范差异。因此，他们确认，在两项决定中适用的道德标准是相同的。在目前的工作中，我认为这些决定之间存在相关的规范差异，两项决定中适用的道德标准必须不同。©2021 Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Filosofico。保留所有权利。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Asignar y reasignar

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, several authors have analyzed what is the appropriate moral criterion to distribute scarce therapeutic resources. In doing so they assume that there is no relevant normative difference between the distribution of unallocated therapeutic resources and the distribution of therapeutic resources that have already been allocated. Consequently, they affirm that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions is the same. In the present work, I argue that there is a relevant normative difference between these decisions and that the moral criterion to be applied in both decisions must be different. © 2021 Sociedad Argentina de Analisis Filosofico. All rights reserved.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Analisis Filosofico PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

15 weeks

期刊介绍： Análisis Filosófico is an open access scientific journal issued by the Argentine Society of Philosophical Analysis (SADAF). Since 1981, it offers original and unpublished papers on theoretical and practical philosophy, discussions, critical studies and reviews –in Spanish, English and Portuguese– that contribute to the development of philosophical analysis. Essential conditions for publication are conceptual accuracy, precision and novelty. Its refereeing policy is based on double-blind reviews and external assessment. It is launched twice a year on May and November.